Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:44:25.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Panel discussion section C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2005

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

KUBÁT: What are the differences between both codes for convection simulations without magnetic fields which we have just seen?

FREYTAG: Both codes solve the same set of basic equations and rely on very similar fundamental assumptions. However, the algorithms used to solve the hydrodynamics or the radiation transport equations differ. The codes have no routines in common. There is an ongoing project to perform a simulation of solar granulation with both codes, relying on the very same settings (grid, model extension, equation of state, opacities, ray system, etc.). The remaining differences are tiny, for example, much smaller than the difference between the 2D and the 3D models. Both codes have some extensions (for instance dust or magnetic field) not (yet) found in the other.To search for other articles by the author(s) go to: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© 2004 International Astronomical Union