Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:14:12.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The morphological comparison and analysis of coronal green line

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2018

Xuefei Zhang ,
Yu Liu  and
Mingyu Zhao
Xuefei Zhang
Affiliation:
Yunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650011, China email: [email protected] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Yu Liu
Affiliation:
Yunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650011, China email: [email protected]
Mingyu Zhao
Affiliation:
Yunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650011, China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The coronal is the origins of large-scale solar activity and disastrous space weather, it contains extremely rich information and various physical processes. The coronal loop is a kind of bright structure with hot plasma which is bounded by magnetic field in the coronal, it is a good reflection of the magnetic structure that we can hardly observe directly. It is also the energy channel between the photosphere and coronal, and the study of coronal loop is helpful for us to understand the magnetic line foot movement.

Keywords

CoronaCoronagraphMagnetic fieldsCoronal loop
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S340: Long-term Datasets for the Understanding of Solar and Stellar Magnetic Cycles , February 2018 , pp. 79 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Ichimoto, K., Noguchi, M., & Tanaka, N., et al. 1999, PASJ, 51, 383Google Scholar
Badalyan, O., Obridko, V., & Sykora, J., 2001, Sol. Phys., 199, 421Google Scholar
Sakurai, T., 1998, ASPC Seri., 140, 483Google Scholar
Sakurai, T., 2004, Adv. Space Research, 34, 297Google Scholar
Sakurai, T., & Suematsu, Y., 2002, Adv. Space Research, 29, 1565Google Scholar
Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. T., & Chamberlin, P. C., 2012, Solar Physics, 275, 3Google Scholar
Brekke, P., Kjeldseth-Moe, O., Harrison, R. A., 1997, Solar Physics, 175, 511Google Scholar
Huang, Z., Frazin, R. A., Landi, E., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 86Google Scholar
Aschwanden, M. J., Nitta, N. V., Wulser, J. P., 2008, ApJ, 680, 1477Google Scholar
Golub, L., Nystrom, G, Herant, M, et al. 1990, Nature, 344, 842Google Scholar
Rosner, R, Tucker, W H, Vaiana, G S., 1978, ApJ, 220, 643Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Song, T., & Zhang, X., et al. 2016, IAU Symp., 320, 447Google Scholar