Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:53:15.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gamma-Ray Bursts as Cosmological Probes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Tomonori Totani
Tomonori Totani*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The status and prospects for gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) as cosmological probes are reviewed. Long duration GRBs can potentially be used as an indicator of star formation rate (SFR), though GRB rate might be systematically different from SFR, by the effect of e.g. metallicity. There are several papers claiming that the cosmic GRB rate history is different from that of SFR in the sense that GRB rate is relatively higher than SFR at higher redshifts, which may be explained by the metallicity effect. However, considering the large uncertainties about the efficiency of GRB afterglow detection and redshift determination, it would be conservative to state that the observed GRB rate is roughly consistent with the star formation history. GRBs can also be used as a unique and powerful tool to reveal the reionization history. However, there is practically no progress in this direction since the first GRB-based useful constraint on reionization in 2005 (GRB 050904). The bottleneck now is the insufficient sensitivity of near-infrared spectroscopy, even with 8m class telescopes. The planned 30m class telescopes will bring the next breakthruough. Finally, GRBs can potentially be used as a standard candle to study cosmology by a geometrical test. However, there are still many steps for GRBs to overcome before it produces a result that has strong impact on the cosmology community in the precision cosmology era.

Keywords

cosmology: miscellaneousgamma rays: bursts
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S279: Death of Massive Stars: Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts , April 2011 , pp. 241 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Amati, L., Frontera, F., Tavani, M., et al. 2002, A&A, 390, 81Google Scholar
Andersen, M. I., et al. 2000, A&A, 364, L54Google Scholar
Campisi, M. A., Li, L.-X., & Jakobsson, P. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J., Greiner, J., Khochfar, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A113Google Scholar
Greiner, J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawai, N., et al. 2006, Nature 440, 184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, D. Q. & Reichart, D. E. 2000, ApJ, 536, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, A. & Barkana, R. 2001, ARA&A, 39, 19Google Scholar
Maoz, D. & Mannucci, F. 2011, arXiv:1111.4492Google Scholar
Mészáros, P. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 137Google Scholar
Miralda-Escudé, J. 1998, ApJ, 501, 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piran, T. 2004, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, S.-F., Liang, E.-W., Lu, R.-J., Wei, J.-Y., & Zhang, S.-N. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvaterra, R. et al. 2009, Nature, 461, 1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvaterra, R. et al. 2012, ApJ, 749, 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanvir, N. R., et al. 2009, Nature, 461, 1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totani, T. 1997, ApJ, 486, L71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totani, T., et al. 2006, PASJ, 58, 485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totani, T., Morokuma, T., Oda, T., Doi, M., & Yasuda, N. 2008, PASJ, 60, 1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanderman, D. & Piran, T. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1944Google Scholar
Wijers, R. A. M. J., Bloom, J. S., Bagla, J. S., & Natarajan, P. 1998, MNRAS, 294, L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonetoku, D., Murakami, T., Nakamura, T., et al. 2004, ApJ, 609, 935CrossRefGoogle Scholar