Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:25:44.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Galactic planetary nebulae as absolute probes: The view from Gaia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2017

Letizia Stanghellini
Affiliation:
National Optical Astronomy Observatory 950 N. Cherry Avenue, Tucson (AZ) 85719, USA email: [email protected]
Beatrice Bucciarelli
Affiliation:
INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino (Italy) email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Mario G. Lattanzi
Affiliation:
INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino (Italy) email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Roberto Morbidelli
Affiliation:
INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino (Italy) email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We searched the first Gaia data release for Galactic central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPNe) for parallaxes in order to determine the distances of the hosting PNe. For the small sample of PNe for which a comparison is available, we show that distances derived from Gaia parallaxes agree, within the uncertainties, with the individual PN distances derived by other reliable methods. While Gaia parallaxes available for Galactic CSPNe are still few, and with high uncertainties, we studied the possibility of building a PN distance scale by using the Gaia distances as calibrators. We found that a scale built on the relation between the linear nebular radius and its surface brightness has promising future applications.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Acker, A., Marcout, J., Ochsenbein, F., et al. 1992, The Strasbourg-ESO Catalogue of Galactic Planetary Nebulae. Parts I, II., by Acker, A.; Marcout, J.; Ochsenbein, F.; Stenholm, B.; Tylenda, R.; Schohn, C. European Southern Observatory, & Garching (Germany), 1992, 1047 p., ISBN 3-923524-41-2,Google Scholar
Aller, A., Montesinos, B., Miranda, L. F., Solano, E., & Ulla, A. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 2822 (A15)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciardullo, R., Bond, H. E., Sipior, M. S., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 488 (C99)Google Scholar
Frew, D. J., Parker, Q. A., & Bojičić, I. S. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 1459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2016, arXiv:1609.04172Google Scholar
Gathier, R., Pottasch, S. R., & Pel, J. W. 1986, A&A, 157, 171 (G86)Google Scholar
Huemer, G. & Weinberger, R. 1988, A&AS, 72, 383 (HW88)Google Scholar
Lindegren, L., Lammers, U., Bastian, U., et al. 2016, arXiv:1609.04303Google Scholar
Pereira, C. B. 2004, A&A, 413, 1009 (P04)Google Scholar
Pereira, C. B., Baella, N. O., Daflon, S., & Miranda, L. F. 2010, A&A, 509, A13 (P10)Google Scholar
Stanghellini, L., Shaw, R. A., & Villaver, E., 2008, ApJ, 689, 194202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar