Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:37:59.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dwarf galaxies and the Magnetisation of the IGM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Uli Klein*
Affiliation:
Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, Bonn, Germany email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With the operation of LOFAR, a great opportunity exists to shed light on a problem of some cosmological significance. Diffuse radio synchrotron emission not associated to any obvious discrete sources as well as Faraday rotation in clusters of galaxies both indicate that the intergalactic or intracluster medium (IGM, ICM) is pervaded by a weak magnetic field, along with a population of relativistic particles. Both, particles and fields must have been injected into the IGM either by Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) or by normal star-forming galaxies. Excellent candidates for the latter are starburst dwarf galaxies, which in the framework of hierarchical structure formation must have been around in large numbers. If this is true, one should be able to detect extended synchrotron halos of formerly highly relativistic particles around local starburst or post-starburst dwarf galaxies. With LOFAR, one should easily find these out to the Coma Cluster and beyond.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Bertone, S., Enßlin, , & Vogt, C. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, J., Martini, P., & Kaiser, C. 2008, ApJ, 676, 147Google Scholar
Chyzy, K. T., Beck, R., Kohle, S., Klein, U., & Urbanik, M. 2000, A&A, 355, 128Google Scholar
Clarke, T. E., Kronberg, P. P. & Böhringer, H. 2001, ApJ, 547, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Ceca, R., Griffiths, R. E., Heckman, T. M., & MacKenty, J. W. 1996, ApJ, 469, 662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, I.M., Gregorini, L., & Klein, U. 1982, A&A, 116, 164Google Scholar
Giovannini, G., Feretti, L., Venturi, T., Kim, K.-T., & Kronberg, P. P. 1993, ApJ, 406, 399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, U. 1982, A&A, 116, 175Google Scholar
Klein, U., Weiland, H., & Brinks, E. 1991, A&A, 246, 323Google Scholar
Klein, U., Hummel, E., Bomans, D.J., & Hopp, U. 1996, A&A, 313, 396Google Scholar
Kronberg, P. P., Lesch, H., & Hopp, U. 1999, ApJ, 511, 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. L. 1998, ApJ, 506, 222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. L. 1999, ApJ, 513, 156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mühle, S. 2003, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. BonnGoogle Scholar
Röttgering, H., Snellen, I., Miley, G., de Jong, J. P., Hanisch, R. J., & Perley, R. 1994, ApJ, 436, 654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijbring, D., & de Bruyn, A. G. 1998, A&A, 331, 901Google Scholar
Skillman, E. D., & Klein, U. 1988, A&A, 199, 61Google Scholar