Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:02:51.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Azimuthal Distribution of Dust Particles in an Eccentric Protoplanetary Disk with an Embedded Gas Giant Planet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Pin-Gao Gu
Affiliation:
Instituter of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 10617, Taiwan email: [email protected]
He-Feng Hsieh
Affiliation:
Instituter of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 10617, Taiwan email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigate the dust velocity and spatial distribution in an eccentric protoplanetary disk under the secular gravitational perturbation of an embedded planet of about 5 Jupiter masses. We first employ the FARGO code to obtain the two-dimensional density and velocity profiles of the gas disk with the embedded planet in the quasi-steady state. We then apply the secular perturbation theory and incorporate the gas drag to estimate the dust velocity on the secular timescale. The dust-to-gas ratio of the unperturbed disk is simply assumed to be 0.01. In our fiducial disk model with the planet at 5 AU, we find that for 0.01 cm– to 1 m–sized dust particles well coupled to the gas, the dust behaves similarly to the gas and exhibits non-axisymmetric dynamics as a result of eccentric orbits. However, for the case of a low-density gaseous disk (termed “transition disk” henceforth in this article) harboring the planet at 100 AU, the azimuthal distributions of dust of various sizes can deviate significantly.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Andrews, S. M.et al. 2011, ApJ, 732, 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunhill, A., Alexander, R., & Armitage, P. 2012, MNRAS, 428, 3072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouchet, L., Gonzalez, J.-F., & Maddison, S. T. 2010, A&A, 518, 16Google Scholar
Kley, W. & Dirksen, G. 2006, A&A, 447, 369Google Scholar
Masset, F. 2000, A&AS, 141, 165Google Scholar
Paardekooper, S.-J., Thébault, P., & Mellema, G. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 57Google Scholar