Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:55:40.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Investigation of the Small Eccentricity in the Spectroscopic Binary System ζ TrA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2007

S. Komonjinda
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand email: [email protected]
J.B. Hearnshaw
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand email: [email protected]
D.J. Ramm
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The orbital eccentricity of the SB1 system ζ TrA (S.T. F9V, P ∼ 13 d) was found by Skuljan et al. (2004) to be e = 0.01398 ± 0.00019. Lucy (2005) devised a statistical test of the significance of this result, based on the amplitude and phase of the third harmonic in the Fourier analysis of the radial velocity data, and concluded that the non-zero eccentricity measured does not arise from a slightly eccentric Keplerian orbit, but from proximity effects in the binary. He therefore believes a circular orbit should be assigned to this system. In this paper we investigate one possible proximity effect, namely the tidal distortion of the primary star, such that the measured Doppler shift does not accurately indicate the centre of mass radial velocity of the star as a whole. The code of Wilson & Devinney (2003) was used to model the tidal distortion of the measured radial velocities, assuming a range of possible secondary masses, corresponding to M-dwarf companions. The result is that even for the lowest possible mass secondary of 0.09M with sin i = 1 (this gives the greatest tidal distortion, as it is closest to the primary) there is no significant effect on the radial velocities (the differences are of order 1 m s−1 as a result of the tidal effects). Similar negligible tidal effects arise using a white dwarf companion. We note that the difference between a circular orbit and the observations amounts to as much as 140 m s−1 at some phases, which is essentially the amplitude of the second harmonic in the data. Our conclusion is that this strong and highly significant second harmonic is most probably the result of a small orbital eccentricity as reported by Skuljan et al (2004). We note that the observed third harmonic according to Lucy (2005) has an amplitude of only 5.2 ± 2.0 m s−1, which is just over twice the error bar of its measurement, and that the predicted third harmonic for an eccentric orbit is only 1.6 m s−1.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Budding, E. 2006, (Private communication)Google Scholar
Henry, T.J., Soderblom, D.R., Donahue, R.A., & Baliunas, S.L. 1996, AJ 111, 439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilditch, R.W. 2001, An Introduction to Close Binary Stars, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J.R., Villarreal, A.R., Soderblom, D.R., Gulliver, A.F., & Adelman, S.J. 2003, AJ 125, 1980 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, L.B. & Sweeney, M.A. 1971, AJ 76, 544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, L.B. 2005, A&A 439, 663 Google Scholar
Skuljan, J., Ramm, D.J., & Hearnshaw, J.B. 2004, MNRAS 325, 975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterne, T.E. 1941, Proc Nat Acad Sci 27, 168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.E. & Devinney, E.J. 1971, ApJ, 166, 605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar