Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:04:14.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WHEN WORLDS COLLIDE – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISSUES IMPEDING ADOPTION OF AGILE FOR HARDWARE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Matthew Peterson  and
Joshua Summers
Matthew Peterson
Affiliation:
Clemson University;
Joshua Summers*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Dallas
*
Summers, Joshua, Clemson University Mechanical Engineering United States of America, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The objective of this paper is to explore challenges identified for implementation of scrum for hardware development intersect with agile principles found in the literature. A series of comparative analyses are done at the textual level, through logical intersections, and through thematic analysis. It is shown that there are five underlying themes found across two sets of scrum challenges (constraints of physicality and the 13 principles). These five themes include: flexiblity, chunkability, scalability, endurability, and teamability. These five themes further are found related to the defining principles of the agile manifesto. Using this understanding, future efforts will include empirical case study work to determine the impact that these have on application of scrum methods and tools. Additionally, guidelines should be developed to help hardware product engineers in applying scrum.

Keywords

Design methodsCase studyEarly design phasesCollaborative design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 3451 - 3460
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Böhmer, AI, Hugger, P and Lindemann, U (2017) Scrum within hardware development insights of the application of scrum for the development of a passive exoskeleton. In: 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 2017, pp. 790–798. IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristal, M, Wildt, D and Prikladnicki, R (2008) Usage of Scrum practices within a global company. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, 2008, pp. 222–226. IEEE.Google Scholar
Deerwester, S, Dumais, ST, Furnas, GW, et al. (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American society for information science 41(6): 391–407.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingsøyr, T, Nerur, S, Balijepally, V, et al. (2012) A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fowler, M and Highsmith, J (2001) The agile manifesto. Software Development 9(8). [San Francisco, CA: Miller Freeman, Inc., 1993-: 28–35.Google Scholar
Freudenberg, S and Sharp, H (2010) The top 10 burning research questions from practitioners. Ieee Software 27(5. IEEE: 8–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuhjelm, J, Segertoft, J, Justice, J, et al. (2017) Owning the Sky with Agile: Building a Jet Fighter Faster, Cheaper, Better with Scrum. Global Scrum Gathering, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Garzaniti, N, Briatore, S, Fortin, C, et al. (2019) Effectiveness of the scrum methodology for agile development of space hardware. In: 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2019, pp. 1–8. IEEE.Google Scholar
Gregory, P, Barroca, L, Taylor, K, et al. (2015) Agile challenges in practice: a thematic analysis. In: International Conference on Agile Software Development, 2015, pp. 64–80. Springer.Google Scholar
Haskins, C and Forsberg, K (2011) Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities. Incose. DOI: INCOSE-TP-2003-002-03.2. 1.Google Scholar
Heimicke, J, Niever, M, Zimmermann, V, et al. (2019) Comparison of Existing Agile Approaches in the Context of Mechatronic System Development: Potentials and Limits in Implementation. In: Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 2019, pp. 2199–2208. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Highsmith, J and Cockburn, A (2001) Agile software development: The business of innovation. Computer 34(9). IEEE: 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jänsch, J and Birkhofer, H (2006) The development of the guideline VDI 2221-the change of direction. In: DS 36: Proceedings DESIGN 2006, the 9th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2006.Google Scholar
Kapurch, SJ (2007) NASA Systems Engineering Handbook. NASA Special Publication.Google Scholar
Marxt, C and Hacklin, F (2005) Design, product development, innovation: all the same in the end? A short discussion on terminology. Journal of Engineering Design 16(4). Taylor & Francis: 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motte, D (2015) Effectiveness of the systematic engineering design methodology. In: International Conference on Engineering Design (eds C Weber, S Husung, M Cantamessa, et al.), Milan, Italy, 2015, pp. 77–86. The Design Society.Google Scholar
Ovesen, N (2012) The challenges of becoming Agile: Implementing and conducting scrum in integrated product development. Department of Architecture and Design, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
Ovesen, N and Dowlen, C (2012) The challenges of becoming agile–experiences from new product development in industry and design education. In: International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, 2012. London South Bank University.Google Scholar
Pahl, G, Beitz, W, Blessing, L, et al. (2013) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach (Seconded. ). 3rd ed. London: Springer-Verlag London Limited.Google Scholar
Palmqvist, O and Trifunov, M (2019) Agile hardware development.Google Scholar
Permana, PAG (2015) Scrum method implementation in a software development project management. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 6(9): 198–204.Google Scholar
Rigby, DK, Sutherland, J and Noble, A (2018) Agile at scale. Harvard Business Review 96(3): 88–96.Google Scholar
Schmidt, TS, Chahin, A, Kößler, J, et al. (2017) Agile development and the constraints of physicality: a network theory-based cause-and-effect analysis. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 4: Design Methods, Vancouver, Canada, 2017, pp. 199–208. The Design Society.Google Scholar
Schwaber, K and Sutherland, J (2011) The scrum guide. Scrum Alliance 21: 19.Google Scholar
Smith, PG (2008) Change: Embrace it, don't deny it. Research-Technology Management 51(4). Taylor & Francis: 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinkellner, S, Andersson, H, Gavel, H, et al. (2009) Modeling and Simulation of Saab Gripen's Vehicle Systems. In: AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, 2009, p. 6134.Google Scholar
Ullman, DG (2019a) 13 Challenges When Applying Scrum to Hardware Design. Machine Design, December.Google Scholar
Ullman, DG (2019b) Scrum for Hardware Design: Supporting Material for the Mechanical Design Process. Corvallis, OR: David Ullman LLC.Google Scholar
Wagner, S (2014) Scrum for cyber-physical systems: a process proposal. In: Proceedings Of The 1St International Workshop On Rapid Continuous Software Engineering, 2014, pp. 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar