Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:34:00.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PARAMETERS ON SUPPORT STRUCTURE DESIGN FOR METAL ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

Part of: Design Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

S. Weber ,
J. Montero ,
M. Bleckmann  and
K. Paetzold
S. Weber*
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany Bundeswehr Research Institute for Materials, Fuels and Lubricants, Germany
J. Montero
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany Bundeswehr Research Institute for Materials, Fuels and Lubricants, Germany
M. Bleckmann
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr Research Institute for Materials, Fuels and Lubricants, Germany
K. Paetzold
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany
*
*[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The topic of support structure design in the Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) field is not addressed with the same relevance as the topic of part design. Therefore, this contribution investigates parameters for both the manufacturing and support structure design for the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) process. Matrices for cause-effect-relations of manufacturing and design parameters on build properties as well as correlations of them are presented. Based on these, recommendations for actions for experimental procedures are derived following the Design of Experiments method.

Keywords

additive manufacturing3D printingdesign for x (DfX)powder bed fusionsupport structure
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 1145 - 1154
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bartsch, K. et al. (2019), “A Novel Approach to Support Structures Optimized for Heat Dissipation in SLM by Combining Process Simulation with Topology Optimization”, NAFEMS World Congress, Vol. 2019, p. 25.Google Scholar
Calignano, F. (2014), “Design optimization of supports for overhanging structures in aluminum and titanium alloys by selective laser melting”, Materials & Design, Vol. 64, pp. 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIN (2017), DIN EN ISO/ASTM 52900:2017-06, Additive Fertigung- Grundlagen- Terminologie (ISO/ASTM 52900:2015); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO/ASTM 52900:2017, Beuth Verlag GmbH, available at: https://doi.org/10.31030/2631641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domagala, T. (2018), “Increase productivity in the Metal 3D Printing industry”, presented at the 3D Valley Conference, Aachen, 26 September, available at: https://3d-valley.com/event-materials/Tim_Domagala_Materialise.pdf (accessed 29 October 2019).Google Scholar
Dordlofva, C. and Törlind, P. (2018), “Design for Qualification: A Process for Developing Additive Manufacturing Components for Critical Systems”, p. 10.Google Scholar
Gibson, I. (2017), “The changing face of additive manufacturing”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussein, A. et al. (2013), “Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 213 No. 7, pp. 1019–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J., Xu, X. and Stringer, J. (2018), “Support Structures for Additive Manufacturing: A Review”, Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, Vol. 2 No. 4, p. 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Y.-H. et al. (2018), “Support structure design in additive manufacturing based on topology optimization”, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercelis, P. and Kruth, J. (2006), “Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, J. et al. (2019), “Spare part production in remote locations through Additive Manufacturing enhanced by agile development principles”, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering. Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleifenbaum, J.H. et al. (2019), “Future AM: Die nächste Generation additiver Fertigungsverfahren”, In: Neugebauer, R. (Ed.), Biologische Transformation, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strano, G. et al. (2013), “A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 66 No. 9, pp. 1247–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VDI (2014), VDI 3405, Additive Fertigungsverfahren - Grundlagen, Begriffe, Verfahrensbeschreibungen, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V.Google Scholar
Wohlers, T. (2019), Wohlers Report 2019: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, K. et al. (2018), “Study on the Geometric Design of Supports for Overhanging Structures Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting”, Materials, Vol. 12, p. 1, available at:https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010027CrossRefGoogle Scholar