Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:12:37.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nutritive evaluation of heat-treated cottonseed with in vitro gas production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

A. R. Foroughi*
Affiliation:
Dep of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mashhad, PO Box 91775-1163, Mashhad, Iran
A. A. Naserian
Affiliation:
Dep of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mashhad, PO Box 91775-1163, Mashhad, Iran
R. Valizadeh
Affiliation:
Dep of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mashhad, PO Box 91775-1163, Mashhad, Iran
M. Danesh Mesgaran
Affiliation:
Dep of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mashhad, PO Box 91775-1163, Mashhad, Iran
A. Mirhady
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Institiute, PO Box 1483-31585, Karaj, Iran
Get access

Extract

Biological methods are more meaningful since microorganisms and enzymes are more sensitive to factors influencing the rate and extent of digestion than are chemical methods (Getachew and et al,1997).Gas measurements provides a useful data on digestion kinetics of both soluble and insoluble fractions of feedstuffs. The objective of this experiment was to determine nutritive value evaluation of heat-treated cottonseed with in vitro gas production.

Type
Feed Characterisation
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Getachew, G. and et al. 1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Animal Feed Sci. and Technol. 72: 261281.Google Scholar
Theodorou, M. K and et al. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. & Tech. 48: 185197.Google Scholar