Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:34:00.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health status, production and reproduction performance in cattle herds as influenced by management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

E Knapp ,
P Chapaux ,
L Istasse  and
K Touati
E Knapp
Affiliation:
Nutrition Unit, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium
P Chapaux
Affiliation:
Association Wallonne de l’Elevage, 5590 Ciney, Belgium
L Istasse*
Affiliation:
Nutrition Unit, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium
K Touati
Affiliation:
Ruminants and pigs clinics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Extract

The overall trend of the reproduction performance is a reduction since at least 20 years. In Belgium, the pregnancy rate at artificial insemination decreases about 1% per year (Opsomer et al, 2006). To obtain good reproduction performance, many requisite factors are necessary. Health status, nutritional status or production level are some well-known examples. Many studies review these factors and their impact on the reproduction performance. The aim of this work was to describe the impact of health status, production and management on the reproduction performance in Walloon farms.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2009 , April 2009 , pp. 36
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Opsomer, G., Leroy, J.L.M.R., Vanholder, T., Bossaert, P. and de Kruif, A. 2006. Vlaam..Diergeneeskd. Tijdschr., 75, 113–119.Google Scholar