Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:23:32.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Benefits of yeast culture supplementation for digestion and milk composition in mares

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

J. A. Pickard  and
G. Bertin
J. A. Pickard*
Affiliation:
Alltech Biotechnology Centre, Sarney, Summerhill Rd, Dunboyne, Co. Meath. Ireland.
G. Bertin
Affiliation:
Alltech France, 2-4 avenue du 6 juin 1944, 95190 Goussainville, France
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Extract

Feeding strategies for performance horses generally involves the substitution of one-two thirds of the fibrous feeds (e.g., forages and pastures) with starchy materials, primarily cereal grains. Such strategies can result in enhanced susceptibility to colic or laminitis (Kronfeld and Harris, 1997) which can be reduced through the use of beneficial microbial combinations that increase nutrient availability, modify gut microflora and enhance performance. One source of microbial live populations is a yeast culture Saccharomyces cerevisae (Yea-Sacc 1026; CBS 493.94, Alltech Inc, USA) which has been shown to increase the digestibility of gross energy (GE) and enhance the retention of N in yearling horses (Glade and Biesik, 1986), together with enhanced performance. The aim of this review is to determine the effects of S. cerevisae on the digestibility of nutrients in the mare, and subsequent effects on milk composition, quality and performance of the offspring.

Type
Poster Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2004 , 2004 , pp. 148
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Glade, M. J. 1991a. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 11 (2): 10 Google Scholar
Glade, M. J. 1991b. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 11 (2): 89.Google Scholar
Glade, M. J. 1991c. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 11 (6): 323 Google Scholar
Glade, M. J., and Biesik, L. M. 1986. Journal of Animal Science 62: 1635.Google Scholar
Hill, J., and Gutsell, S. 1998. Proceedings of the Society of Animal Sceince 128.Google Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S., and Harris, P. 1997. In: The Veterinarian’s Practical Reference to Equine Nutrition. Thompson, K. N. (Ed.). pp. 61–77. Purina Mills, Inc., St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. F., Aherne, F. X., and Okal, D. B. 1974. Journal of Animal Science 34: 107.Google Scholar
Medina, B., Girard, I. D., Jacotot, E. and Julliand, V. 2002. Journal of Animal Science 80: 2600.Google Scholar
Oftedal, O. T., Hintz, H. F., and Schryver, H. F. 1983. Journal of Nutrition 113: 2196.Google Scholar