Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:48:46.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic differences in milk production in relation to mature body weight†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. S. Taylor
C. S. Taylor
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh, EH9 3JQ
Get access

Extract

A survey of the accumulated experimental evidence suggests that the general effect of genetic differences in body size on input-output relationships in livestock might be largely accounted for by the following two genetic sizescaling rules:

1. treat all age and time variables for the ith genotype as directly proportional to Mi0·27, where Mi is the mature body weight of the ith genotype;

2. at every age standardized as in (1), treat all cumulated inputs and outputs for the zth genotype as directly proportional to Mi.

Type
55th Meeting, Harper Adams, 18 to 22 September 1972 Symposium: Size of Animal in Relation to Productivity with Special Reference to the Ruminant
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972) , Volume 2 , January 1973 , pp. 15 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This paper covers only part of the material reviewed by Dr Taylor at the Symposium; the other sections will be published elsewhere.

References

Blaxter, K. L. 1971. The comparative biology of lactation. In Lactation (ed. Falconer, I. R.), pp. 51–69. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and Growth, Reinhold Pub. Co., New York.Google Scholar
Davis, H. P., Morgan, R. F. and Gaines, W. L. 1943. Liveweight and milk energy yield in the Nebraska Station dairy herd. J. Dairy Sci. 26: 625–641.Google Scholar
Dohy, J. 1971. Investigations on correlations between milk production and body weight of the cow in the Hungarian Red Pied, Danish Red Pied and Finnish Ayrshire breeds. Annls Génét. Sél. anim. 3: 107.Google Scholar
Dohy, J. and Kelemeri, G. 1968. Correlations between liveweight of the cow and its absolute and relative milk production in the Red Danish milk breed. Acta agron. hung. 17: 231–237.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. 1936. Effect of breed, size of cow, yield of milk and stage of lactation upon efficiency of milk production. J. Dairy Res. 8: 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harville, D. A. and Henderson, C. R. 1966. Interrelationships among age, body weight, and production traits during first lactations of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 49: 1254–1261.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. 1973. Size of animal in relation to productivity. Nutritional aspects. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1973, 2: 27–34.Google Scholar
Horn, A., Bozo, S. and Dunay, A. 1971. The effect of size and type upon the efficiency of milk and beef production in cattle. Annls Génét. Sél. anim. 3: 71–83.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, J. and Ricordeau, G. 1966. Genetic correlations between milk production and conformation in the Montbeliard and Normandy cattle breeds. 9th int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Edinb. 1966. Scient. Progm. Abstr., Eng. ed., p. 16.Google Scholar
Leuthold, G. and Schönmuth, G. 1971. [Evaluation of dairy cattle on the basis of their relative production as exemplified by results for Jersey crossbreds.] Arch. Tierz. 14: 13–24.Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. 1972. Milk yield, energy loss in milk, and mammary gland weight in different species. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 34: 351–360.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L., Robertson, A. and Gjelstad, B. 1957. The genetic connexion between body size, milk production and efficiency in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Res. 24: 135–143.Google Scholar
Miller, R. H. and Mcgilliard, L. D. 1959. Relations between weight at first calving and milk production during first lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 42: 1932–1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1953. Rep. Prodn. Divn. No. 4. Thames Ditton.Google Scholar
Nazarec, P. M. 1957. The desirable type of dairy cattle. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 26: 131 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Nedava, V. E. 1970. Genetic control of food conversion for milk in Simmental cattle. Tsitol. Genet. 4: 447–450.Google Scholar
Payne, P. R. and Wheeler, E. F. 1968. Comparative nutrition in pregnancy and lactation. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 27: 129–138.Google Scholar
Rønningen, K. 1967. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for characters related to milk production in cattle. Acta Agric. scand. 17: 83–100.Google Scholar
Singh, R. A. and Desai, R. N. 1964. Genetic studies on relative efficiency of milk production in crossbreds (Holstein × Sahiwal) as compared to pure Sahiwal cattle. Indian vet. J. 41: 169–174.Google Scholar
Syrstad, O. 1966. Studies on dairy herd records. IV. Estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters. Ada Agric. scand. 16: 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S. 1965. A relation between mature weight and time taken to mature in mammals. Anim. Prod. 7: 203–220.Google Scholar