Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:41:22.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fermentation characteristics in clamp and big bale silages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

D I Givens
Affiliation:
ADAS Nutrition Chemistry Feed Evaluation UnitAlcester Road, Stratford on Avon CV37 9RQ
Susan Roscoe
Affiliation:
ADAS Nutrition Chemistry Feed Evaluation UnitAlcester Road, Stratford on Avon CV37 9RQ
Jeannie M Brunnen
Affiliation:
ADAS Nutrition Chemistry Feed Evaluation UnitAlcester Road, Stratford on Avon CV37 9RQ
Get access

Extract

In recent years big bale silage (BBS) made in large plastic bags has become an increasingly popular method of grass conservation with one estimate (Catt, 1986) suggesting that 30% of all grass silage in the UK was conserved in this way in 1985.

In general BBS is drier than clamp silage (CS) (Butler, 1983) primarily for economic reasons related to contracters.charges for baling the reduced number of bales compared to wet silage. There are however few comparative data on concentrations of fermentation acids and it is not clear whether the fermentation characteristics of BBS are different from CS or merely a function of differences in dry matter content.

Type
Silage and Beef Production
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, G. (1983) Anim.Prod. 36, 541542 (Abs).Google Scholar
Catt, W.R. (1986) In “Developments in Silage 1986”. Ed. Stark, B. and Wilkinson, M., Chalcombe Publications, Marlow. p 3.Google Scholar
Dewar, W.A. and McDonald, P. (1961) J.Sci.Fd.Agric. 12, 790795.Google Scholar
MAFF (1981). Reference Book 427. HMSO, London.Google Scholar