Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:31:37.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Sward Surface Height on Ewe and Lamb Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

B J Keeling
Affiliation:
North of Scotland College of Agriculture581 King StreetAberdeen AB9 1UD
C K Mackie
Affiliation:
North of Scotland College of Agriculture581 King StreetAberdeen AB9 1UD
M E King
Affiliation:
North of Scotland College of Agriculture581 King StreetAberdeen AB9 1UD
C W Watt
Affiliation:
North of Scotland College of Agriculture581 King StreetAberdeen AB9 1UD
Get access

Extract

Sward Surface Height (SSH) can be used as a guide for grazing control and recommendations are available for target SSH at various times of the year and at different levels of performance (Hodgson et al 1986).

188 mule ewes with Suffolk cross lambs were allocated to 2 target SSH, 1-6 cm and 6-8 cm. Each treatment was replicated twice and balanced for ewe age, liveweight and condition score and the age, sex and rearing status of the lambs. The areas grazed were under permanent grass (mainly perennial ryegrass) and received 255 kg N/ha applied in 4 dressings with balancing P. and K. The initial stocking rate was 14.7 ewes/ha with 23.2 lambs/ha. SSH was measured weekly using an HFRO swardstlck with 40 readings taken per area. SSH was maintained using a temporary electric fence to adjust the size of the grazing area. Adjustments were made on a pre-set pattern which took into account any difference between current and target SSH and any change in SSH over the previous week. The area adjustments are shown in Table 1.

Lambs were weighed at fortnightly intervals initially and at weekly intervals from the beginning of July. Lambs were drawn for slaughter at constant condition (3L). Ewes were condition scored and weighed at turnout (12th May), 6 weeks after turnout and at weaning (11th August).

Type
Sheep Production
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hodgson, J, Mackie, C K and Parker, J W G (1988) “Grass Farmer” No 24 pp 510.Google Scholar