Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:28:28.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct intrauterine versus cervical insemination:- effects on egg recovery and fertilization in superovulated ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

J. J. Robinson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. M. Wallace
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
R. P. Aitken
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Extract

The problem of partial or complete failure of fertilization following cervical insemination in superovulated ewes submitted for embryo transfer can largely be overcome by depositing semen directly into the uterine lumen. However this technique, when carried out by mid-line laparotomy in superovulated ewes is associated with a significant reduction in ovum recovery (Trounson & Moore, 1974; Boland & Gordon, 1978). Although the recent introduction of laparoscopic intrauterine (IU) insemination has now removed the need for major surgery when inseminating superovulated ewes its use in non-superovulated ewes often results in a slight depression in litter size (McKelvey, Robinson, Aitken & Henderson, 1985). Such results imply that it too may reduce embryo recovery rates. Indeed our initial experience with the widespread use of the laparoscopic technique to inseminate superovulated ewes, although devoid of proper conventionally-inseminated controls, gave disappointingly low values for embryo recovery.

The present study was carried out therefore to determine the effect of direct intrauterine versus natural cervical insemination on egg recovery and fertilization rates in ewes superovulated using porcine FSH or PMSG and GnRH.

Type
Reproduction
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Trounson, A. O. & Moore, N. W. (1974) Fertilization in the ewe following multiple ovulation and uterine insemination. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 27; 301304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Boland, M. P. & Gordon, I. (1978) Recovery and fertilization of eggs following natural service and uterine insemination in the Galway ewe. Irish Vet. J. 32, (7); 123125.Google Scholar
3. McKelvey, W. A. C., Robinson, J. J., Aitken, R. P. & Henderson, G. (1985) The evaluation of a laparoscopic insemination technique in ewes. Theriogenology 24; 519-435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed