Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:24:19.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Russian Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Bakhtiyar Tuzmukhamedov
Bakhtiyar Tuzmukhamedov*
Affiliation:
Diplomatic Academy of Moscow, Russian Association of International Law, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Humanitarian Law & Non-State Actors
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 102 , 2008 , pp. 441 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

† Mr. Dunlap and Mr. Tomarchio did not submit remarks for the Proceedings.

1 Abresch, Willam, A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya, 16 EJIL 754 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Tuzmukhamedov, Bakhtiyar, Preemption by Armed Force of Transboundary Terrorist Threats: the Russian Perspective, in Global Legal Challenges: Command of the Commons, Strategic Communications and Natural Disasters (International Law Studies) (Carsten, Michael D. ed., 2007)Google Scholar.

3 Milanovic, Marko, Lessons for human rights and humanitarian law in the war on terror: comparing Hamdan and the Israeli Targeted Killings case, 866 Int’L Rev. Red Cross 380 (2007)Google Scholar.

4 On Additional Guarantees and Compensations for Military Service Personnel Serving on Territories of States of Trans-Caucasus, Baltic States, and the Republic of Tajikistan, and on Performing Assignments During the State of Emergency and in Armed Conflicts, Vedomosti S‘‘ezda Narodnykh Deputatov i Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Ved. RF] [Bulletin of the Congress of People’s Deputies and of the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation] 1993, No. 6, Item 181.

5 Federal Law of the Russian Federation, No. 75-FZ, Sobrante Zakonodate‘stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [SZ RF] [Russian Federation Collection of Legislation] 1995, No. 21, Item 1923; see also Federal Law of the Russian Federation, No. 146-FZ, SZ RF 1997, No. 47, Item 5343 (emphasis added).

6 Fin. Times, Dec. 11, 1999.

7 Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Apr. 19, 2002.

8 See Prosecutor v. Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, No. IT-94-1-T (Oct. 5, 1995), ¶ 70. The Chamber defined “armed conflict” as follows: “... an armed conflict exists whenever there is a resort to armed force between States or protracted armed violence between governmental authorities and organized armed groups or between such groups within a State. International humanitarian law applies from the initiation of such armed conflicts and extends beyond the cessation of hostilities until a general conclusion of peace is reached; or, in the case of internal conflicts, a peaceful settlement is achieved. Until that moment, international humanitarian law continues to apply in the whole territory of the warring States or, in the case of internal conflicts, the whole territory under the control of a party, whether or not actual combat takes place there.”