Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T15:33:37.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of International Law in Intrastate Natural Resource Allocation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Lillian Aponte Miranda
Lillian Aponte Miranda*
Affiliation:
Florida International University College of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
New Voices I: Humanizing Conflict
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 106 , 2012 , pp. 75 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See G.A. Res. 1803 (XVII), UN Doc. A/5217 (Dec. 14, 1962) (Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources). For a comprehensive analysis of the doctrine of permanent sovereignty over natural resources, see Nico Schrijver, Sovereignty Over Natural Resources: Balancing Rights and Duties (1997); Gheorghe Elian, Principles of Sovereignty Over Natural Resources (1979).

2 See Anghie, Antony, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law 213 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (discussing the different legal arguments proposed by the West and the Third World in the formulation of a New International Economic Order); see also G.A. Res. 3201 (S-VI) at 4, UN Doc. A/RES/S-6/3201 (May 1, 1974) (Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order) (emphasizing sovereignty and equality as the basis for developing countries to regain effective control over their natural resources and economic activities).

3 See, e.g., UN Econ. & Soc. Council [ECOSOC], Sub-Comm’n on the Promotion & Prot. of Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Peoples ‘ Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources, para. 32, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2004/30 (July 13, 2004) (prepared by Erica-Irene A. Daes); Duruigbo, Emeka, Permanent Sovereignty and Peoples ‘ Ownership of Natural Resources in International Law, 38 Geo. Wash. Int’l. L. Rev. 33, 52 (2006)Google Scholar (arguing that the right to permanent sovereignty over natural resources is vested in peoples, including indigenous peoples).

4 See UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, G.A. Res. 61/295, arts. 26, 28, UN Doc. A/RES/61/295, (Sept. 13, 2007).

5 See id. at art. 32.

6 See Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative Eiti Principles, http://eiti.org/eiti/principles (last visited Apr. 19, 2012).

7 Id.