Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:25:42.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Toby Landau QC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Toby Landau QC
Toby Landau QC*
Affiliation:
Essex Court Chambers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Mapping the Future of Investment Treaty Arbitration as a System of Law
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 103 , 2009 , pp. 326 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For example, notorious and problematic commercial arbitrations such as the Hub Power Company Ltd v. (1) WAPDA & (2) The Federation of Pakistan, Supreme Court of Pak., [2000] 16 Arb. Int’l Himpurna v. Indonesia, 15 Mealey’sInt’l Arb. Rep., 9 (2000).

2 For example, the injunctions issued by national courts to restrain the ICSID arbitrations in SGS v. Pakistan, Case No ARB /01 /13 and Chevron v Bangladesh, Case No ARB /06 /10.