Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:01:19.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks by Michael D. Sandler

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Michael D. Sandler*
Affiliation:
Of the District of Columbia Bar

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Antitrust Implications of Trade Law: Japan, the European Communities, and the United States
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 19 U.S.C. § 2501 (Supp. IV 1980) et. seq.

2 United States v. Aluminum Company of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945).

3 374 U.S. 174 (1963).

4 Tariff Act of 1930, § 337, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980).

5 19 U.S.C. §§ 2251-53 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980).

6 19 U.S.C. § 2131 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980).

7 United Mine Workers v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 (1965); Eastern Railroads Presidents Conf. v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961).

8 United States v. Container Corp. of America, 393 U.S. 133 (1969).

9 See Interamerican Ref. Corp. v. Texaco Marcaibo, Inc., 307 F. Supp. 1291 (D. Del. 1970).

10 Exchange of letters between Ambassador Okawara and Attorney General Smith, reprinted in [1981] INT'L TRADE REP. U.S. IMPORT WEEKLY (BNA) at M-l.