No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Cymie R. Payne
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
- Type
- The Limits of Judicial Mechanisms for Developing and Enforcing International Environmental Norms
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016
Footnotes
She studies global governance of the environment and natural resources and the consequent evolution of international law, with a focus on climate change, ocean resources, and peace building after armed conflict.
References
1 Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Arg. v. Uru.), 2010 ICJ Rep. 4, ¶ 204 (Apr. 20, 2010).
2 Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) (No. 21), Case No. 21, Déclaration de M. le Juge Cot, Advisory Opinion of Apr. 2, 2015, ¶ 11 (“L’avis n’a pas force obligatoire, c’est l’évidence, pas m˪me pour son destinataire, la CSRP. Mais s’il n’a pas d’effet juridique, il n’a pas de sens.”).
3 Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) (No. 21), Case No. 21, Advisory Opinion of Apr. 2, 2015, ITLOS, available at https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.21/advisory_opinion/C21_AdvOp_02.04.pdf.
4 Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area (No. 17), Case No. 17, Advisory Opinion of Feb. 1, 2011, 10 ITLOS Rep. 7, 10.
5 For a discussion of the UNCC generally, see Heiskanen, Veijo, The United Nations Compensation Commission, 269 Recueil Des Cours 259 (2002)Google Scholar; for the environmental program, see Gulf War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission: Environmental Liability (Cymie R. Payne & Peter H. Sand eds., 2011).
6 Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand Intervening), Judgment, 2014 ICJ Rep. 226 (Mar. 31, 2014), available at http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/?les/148/18136.pdf.