Article contents
The Re-Convergence of International Trade and Investment Law: Causes, Questions, and Reform
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
- Type
- International Trade Law and International Investment Law: Complexity and Coherence
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015
References
1 DiMascio, Nicolas & Pauwelyn, Joost, Non-Discrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?, 102 AJIL 48 (2008)Google Scholar.
2 Pauwelyn, Joost, At the Edge of Chaos: Foreign Investment Law as a Complex Adaptive System, How It Emerged and How It Can Be Reformed, 29 ICSID Rev.— Foreign Investment Law Journal (2014) 372–418 Google Scholar.
3 Mobil Invs. Canada, Inc. & Murphy Oil Corp. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Decision on Liability and on Principles of Quantum (May 22, 2012).
4 Pauwelyn, Joost, Dealing with the Increasing Complexity of Investment-Related Treaties: A Framework and Some Policy Guidelines, Investment Treaty News 5–6 (Oct. 2012)Google Scholar, available at http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2012/iisd_itn_october_2012_en.pdf.
5 For an attempt to address these imbalances in access to legal expertise, see www.tradelab.org.
6 See Pauwelyn, supra note 2.
7 Joost Pauwelyn & Wolfgang Alschner, Forget About the WTO: The Network of Relations Between Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) and ‘Double PTAs,’ in Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements (Manfred Elsig & Andreas Dür eds., forthcoming).
- 2
- Cited by