Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:38:20.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Realism and International Law: Two Optics in Need of Each Other

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Andreas Paulus
Andreas Paulus*
Affiliation:
Wissenschaftlicher Assistent, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Realism and Legalism
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 96 , 2002 , pp. 269 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics 72, 97-99 passim (1979).

2 Cf. Morgenthau, Hans J., Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law, 34 AJIL 260, 283 (1940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar). (“Grandiose legalistic schemes purporting to solve the ills of the world have replaced the less spectacular, painstaking search for the actual laws and the facts underlying them.”).

3 See Kenneth N. Waltz, Man, the State, and War (1959); Waltz, supra note 1.

4 See, e.g., Georg Schwarzenberger, The Frontiers of International Law 25 (1962).

5 Weil, Prosper, Towards Relative Normativity in International Law? 77 AJIL 413, 441 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. see also Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Congo v. Belg.) (sep. op. of ICJ President Guillaume), para. 15, 41 ILM. 558 (2002), available ar <http://www.icj-cij.org>.

6 See, e.g., Philip Allott, Eunomia 336, para. 16.99 (1990). See also Simma, Bruno, From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law, 250 Recueil Des Cours 217 (1994 VI)Google Scholar.

7 S.S. Lotus, PCIJ Series a 10 (1927), p. 18.

8 See Hans Kelsen, Peace Through Law (1944); Grenville Clark & Louis John, World Peace Through World Law (3d ed. 1966).

9 See International Regimes (Stephen Krasner ed., 1982).

10 See Kratochwil, Friedrich V., How Do Norms Matter? in The Role of Law in International Politics 35 (Byers, Michael ed., 2000)Google Scholar.

11 66 C.F.R. 57833 (2001), 41 ILM 252 (2002).

12 Department of Defense, Military Commission Order No. 1, 41 ILM 725 (2002), available at <http://www.dod.gov/news/Mar2002/d20020321ord.pdf> (visited Mar. 28, 2002).

13 Jim Garamone, Geneva Convention Applies to Taliban, not Al Qaeda, Am. Forces Info. Service, available at <http://www.dod.gov/news/Feb2002/n02072002_200202074.html> (visited Mar. 28, 2002).

14 Shanker, Thom, Senators Insist on Role in Nuclear Arms Deals, N.Y. Times, Mar. 17, 2002, at 8 Google Scholar.

13 Keller, Bill, The World According to Colin Powell, N.Y. Times Mag., Nov. 25, 2001, at 61 Google Scholar.

15 Bolton, John R., Is There Really “Law” in International Affairs? 10 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 1, 4 (2000)Google Scholar.

17 Vagts, Detlev F., Hegemonic International Law, 95 AJIL 843, 847 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 UN Charter art. 51.

19 Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Grundlinien Der Philosophie Des Rechts (F. Meiner 1955).

20 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 23, 1969, art. 61-62,1155 UNTS 331.

21 Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia), 1997 ICJ Rep. 7, para. 133 (Sept. 25). For the rigidity of Art. 61 and 62, see ibid., paras. 103-104.

22 But see Martti Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia 486 (1989).

23 See Kahler, Miles, Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization, 54 Int’l Org. 661, 679 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Harold Lasswell, Politics: Who Gets What, When, and How? (1936).

25 Herbert L. A. Hart, the Concept of Law 89-91 (2d ed. 1994).