Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:37:31.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rapidly Changing Functions and Slowly Evolving Structures: The Troubling Case of the IMF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Daniel D. Bradlow*
Affiliation:
International Legal Studies Program, American University, Washington College of Law, Washington, DC

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 None of these countries have used the financial resources of the Fund since 1978.

2 Despite this, the IMF continues to devote considerable resources to surveillance of these countries. See External Evaluation of IMF Surveillance: Report by a Group of Independent Experts (IMF, Sept. 1999).

3 Since May 1998 the G-7 countries, the United States, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, France and Canada, have been joined by Russia and constitute the G-8. For current purposes, the relevant group is the old G-7 countries.

4 See External Evaluation of IMF Surveillance, supra note 2 ; Report of the Group of Independent Persons Appointed to Conduct an Evaluation of Certain Aspects of the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, (January 13, 1998) (available from IMF).

5 The World Bank’s Inspection Panel serves this function. See, e.g., I. F. I. Shihata, The World Bank Inspection Panel (1994); Bradlow, D. D., International Organizations and Private Complaints: The Case of the World Bank Inspection Panel. 34 Va. J. Int’l. L. 553 (1994)Google Scholar; Bradlow, D. D. and Schlemmer-Schultz, S., The World Bank’s Inspection Panel: A Constructive Step in the Transformation of the International Legal Order, 54 ZaöRV/Heidelberg J. Int’l. L. 392 (1994)Google Scholar.