Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:16:52.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Procedural Turn in Transnational Abortion Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Joanna N. Erdman*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Family, Sex, and Reproduction: Emerging Issues in International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tysiac v. Poland, App. No. 5410/03, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2007), available at http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/470376112.html.

2 K.L. v. Peru (UN Hum. Rts. Comm.), Comm. No. 1153/2003 (Oct. 24, 2005), UN Doc. CCPR/C/85/D/1153/2003.

3 Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, September 5-13, 1994, UN Doc. A/Conf.171/13 (Oct. 18, 1994).

4 Id. at para. 8.25.

5 Tysiac, supra note 1, at para. 116.

6 Right to Life New Zealand, Inc. v. Abortion Supervisory Committee [2008] Civ 2005-485-000999 (HC).

7 Family Planning Association of Northern Ireland v. Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety, [2004] Nica 39.

8 A, B & C v. Ireland, App. No. 25579/05, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2010), available at http://www.echr.coe.int/echr/homepage_EN.

9 In re Abortion Law Challenge, Sentencia C-355/06 (May 10, 2006) (Colombia Constitutional Court), availablehttp://www.amdh.org.mx/niujeres3/biblioteca/Doc_basicos/5_biblioteca_virtual/6_derechos_sexuales_rep/10.pdf.