Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T12:34:34.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primacy and the Accountability Gap: A View from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

David Schwendiman
David Schwendiman*
Affiliation:
Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Impact of International Criminal Proceedings on National Prosecutions in Mass Atrocity Cases
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 103 , 2009 , pp. 207 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Eric Stover, The Witnesses: War Crimes and the Promise of Justice in the Hague (2005). Professor Stover makes similar observations about witnesses who have appeared in ICTY proceedings, but does not deal at length with the follow on phenomenon of using these same witnesses in domestic proceedings after the international tribunals are finished with them.