Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:43:30.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Origin of Fear in the World Trade System: Excavating the Roots of the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Marjorie Florestal
Marjorie Florestal*
Affiliation:
University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Africa: A New Voices Panel
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 101 , 2007 , pp. 143 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Peter Harrold, The Impact of the Uruguay Round on Africa, Discussion Paper No. 311, Africa Technical Department series, World Bank 1996, available at <http://www.worldbank.org/afr/findings/english/find67.htm> (noting that “For Africa . . . [t]he estimates range from a gain of 1 percent, to several studies that predict losses of about 0.5 percent. Why should such losses occur? These models predict that Africa would gain little of the growth in world trade, as it is not offering significant tariff reductions itself).

2 See, e.g., The Doha Round and African Development: Turning Words into Deeds (Economic Commission for Africa Position Paper Series, Sept. 2003) at 1 (noting that “Africa has not derived any significant gains from trade, reflecting largely the fact that it is not, and has never been, a major player in the global trading system.”).

3 T. N. Smnivasan, Gatt to the Uruguay Round and the Future 25 (1998).

4 Axelle Kabou, Et Si L’Afrique Refusait Le Developpement? (And if Africa Refuses Development?) 17 (1999).

5 Kabou maintains:

The sociological and especially psychological conditions for the success of free enterprise are not yet present in sub-Saharan Africa. Their emergence depends first on the commencement of an immense debate on the connection between development and the mentality of Africans post-independence.

Supra note 4. Kabou’s premise has found favor with other Africanists seeking explanations for Africa’s economic performance. See e.g., Alternatives Sud, Et Si L’Afrique Refusait Le Marche? (And if Africa Refuses the Market?) (2003).

6 The General Act of the Berlin Conference, Article 11.

7 Shepperson, George, 46 The Centennial of the West African Conference of Berlin, 1884-1885, at 41 (1985)Google Scholar.

8 See The General Act of the Berlin Conference, preamble, Articles I, III, IV, and V.

9 The General Act of the Berlin Conference, Preamble.

10 See Minow, Martha, Institutions and Emotions: Redressing Mass Violence, in The Passions of Law 271 (Bendes, Susan ed., 1999)Google Scholar (noting that institutions often “serve[] to channel emotional energy that would otherwise take a destructive form.”); see also Moran, Rachel F. Law and Emotion: Love and Hate, 11 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 747 (2000)Google Scholar (exploring the use of hate crimes criminal laws and torts for seduction and alienation of affection); Dorfman, Deborah A. Through a Therapeutic Jurisprudence Filter: Fear and Pretextuality in Mental Disability Law, 10 N.Y.L. J. Hum.. Rts. 805, 808 (1992)Google Scholar (noting that “[m]uch of the anxiety we feel towards those with mental disabilities stems from our belief that they are dangerous. . . . Our fears are manifested through political pressure on legislators, particularly at the state and local levels, narrowing the legal rights of the mentally ill.”)