Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:02:57.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Iterative Engagements: The European Union and International Normativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Navraj Singh Ghaleigh
Navraj Singh Ghaleigh*
Affiliation:
Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Treaty Bodies and Beyond: The Practice and Process of Translating International Norms into Domestic Law
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 104 , 2010 , pp. 572 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The qualification highlights the sometime problematic relationship between international and European law— see Kadi & Al Barakaat Int’l Found, v. Council & Comm’n, E.C.R 1-6351 (2008), and its voluminous attendant literature.

2 de Witte, Bruno, International Law as a Tool for the European Union, 5 Eur. Const. L. Rev. 265–83, 266 (2009)Google Scholar. Id. at 278. The term “acquis communautaire” refers to the accumulated body of Eu law.

4 Id. at 278, n.42.

5 Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh, Emissions Trading Before the European Court of Justice: Market Making in Luxembourg, in Legal Aspects of Carbon Trading: Kyoto, Copenhagen and Beyond (Freestone, David & Streck, Charlotte eds., 2009)Google Scholar.

6 Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh, Anti-Americanism and the Environment, in 1 Anti-Americanism: History, Causes, Themes 139 (O’Connor, Brendan ed., 2007)Google Scholar.

7 Id.

8 Landler, Mark & Cooper, Helene, After a Bitter Campaign, Forging an Alliance, N.Y. Times, Mar. 18, 2010 Google Scholar.

9 De Witte, supra note 2, at 278.

10 World Bank, State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2009, at 1 (2009).

11 Ghaleigh, supra note 5, at 367.

12 Freestone, David & Frenkil, David, Emissions Trading in the Us: A New Regime Approaching?, VII Eur. Energy L. Rep. 75–94 (2010)Google Scholar.

13 Michael Mehling, Linking of Emissions Trading Schemes, in Legal Aspects of Carbon Trading: Kyoto, Copenhagen and Beyond, supra note 5, at 110-11.

14 Id. at 133.

15 UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/L.8 (Aug. 7, 2003).

16 The abandonment of the Draft Norms project and subsequent work of Ruggie has been criticized in this publication. Weissbrodt, David, UN Perspectives on Business and Humanitarian and Human Rights Obligations, 100 ASIL Proc. 135 (2006)Google Scholar.

17 UN Doc. A/HRC/8/5 (Apr. 7, 2008) (“UN Framework”).

18 Study of the Legal Framework on Human Rights and the Environment Applicable to European Enterprises Operating Outside the EU, available at http://tinyurl.com/6hx4pm2.

19 de Burea, Gráinne, The Eu in The Negotiations of the Disability Convention, Eur. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2010)Google Scholar.

20 Koh, Harold H., Why Transnational Law Matters, 24 Penn St. Int’l Rev. 745 (2006).Google Scholar