Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T02:34:00.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introductory Remarks by Matjaz Nahtigal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Matjaz Nahtigal*
Affiliation:
International Law and International Relations, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Learning from Doha: Can “Development” be Operationalized in International Economic Law?
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This argument was put forward by Joseph Stiglitz & Andrew Charlton, Fair Trade for All (2005), p. 132.

2 Ha-Joon Chang, Painting Carmakers Green; Developed Nations are Trying to get Around WTO Subsidy Rules by Portraying their Industry Bail-outs as Green Initiatives, The Guardian, Feb. 3, 2009.

3 For a detailed analysis of this argument see Singh, Ajit, S&Dt: The Multilateral Trading System and Economic Development in the Twenty First Century in Putting Development First (Gallagher, Kevin ed., 2005), esp. p. 252 and pp. 259-261.Google Scholar

4 Christian Barry & Sanjay Reddy, International Trade & Labor Standards 80-85 (2008). ‘Roberto Unger, Free Trade Reimagined 193-212 (2007).

6 Robert Howse, Mainstreaming the Right to Development in International Trade Law and Policy at the World Trade Organization, UN doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/2004/17, June 2004.