Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:27:08.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developments in the Enforcement of Claims Against Violence Against Women in International Tribunals and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Jennifer M. Green
Jennifer M. Green*
Affiliation:
Center for Constitutional Rights
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Five Years After Beijing: A Report Card on Women’s Human Rights
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 94 , 2000 , pp. 289 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 For further discussion of advocacy, see, e.g., Green, Copelon et. al, Affecting the Rules, Hastings Women’s L. J

3 For a fuller discussion, see The International Criminal Court: The Beijing Platform in Action (2000), attainable from <www.iccwomen.org>.

4 See, e.g., Doe v. Karadzic, 70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995) (court recognized rape as genocide, crime against humanity and war crime); Doe v. Haddam, 993 F.Supp. 3 (D.D.C. 1998) (court stated that claims including rape and sexual slavery are violations of international law as it exists today); Doe v. Unocal, CV 96-6959-RAP (filed Oct. 3, 1996) (plaintiffs claimed systematic use of rape as part of a campaign of intimidation and terror against the civilian population in Burma); Doe v. Gap, CV 99-329 (filed CD. Cal. Jan. 13, 1999) (plaintiffs charged violation of international women’s rights for women threatened with termination of employment should they become pregnant).