No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
* Thanks to Francesco Parisi, Anthony Ogus, Louis Visscher, Ann-Sophie Van den Berghe, Alessio Pacces, Siewert Lindenbergh, Ellen Hey, Michael Faure, and Giuseppe Dari Mattiacci for insightful comments. We are also grateful to the participants of the 2009 ASIL Conference, and, in particular, to Tomer Broude, Alberta Fabbricotti, Carlos Esposito, and Gabrielle Marceau. The usual disclaimer applies.
This essay summarizes the research conducted by the authors and published as an article in Opinio Juris in Comparatione in 2010: Sara Poli & Alessandra Arcuri, What Price for the Community Enforcement of WTO Dispute Settlement Body's Rulings ?, Vol. 1/2010, Paper No. 1 (Mar. 26,2010), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1578831.
1 Case C-120/06 P, FIAMM v. Council & Comm’n, 2008 E.C.R. 1-6513.
2 Case C-377/02, Van Parys v. BIRB, 2005 E.C.R. 1-1465.
3 Calabresi, Guido & Melamed, A. Douglas, Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral, 85(6) Harv. L. Rev. 1089 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Pauwelyn, Joost, The Transformation of World Trade, 104(1) Mich. L. Rev., 1-65 (2005)Google Scholar. In a similar fashion, the exit and voice theoretical framework was earlier applied by Joseph Weiler to study the evolution of the European Community. Weiler, J.J., The Transformation of Europe, 100 Yale L. J. 2403 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 FIAMM, 2008 E.C.R. 1-6513.