Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:39:11.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can International Law Secure Women’s Health? an Examination of CEDAW and its Optional Protocol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Dhrubajyoti Bhattacharya*
Affiliation:
Health Law and Policy, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine; Medical Jurisprudence, Southern Illinois University School of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Poster Session
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (“CEDAW”), G.A. Res. 34/180, Annex, U.N. Doc. A/RES/34/46/Annex (Dec. 18, 1979).

2 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (“Protocol”), U.N. Doc. A/54/49 (Oct. 15, 1999).

3 Id. art. 2.

4 Id.

5 Id. art. 6.

6 Id. art. 5(1).

7 Compilation of Rules of Procedure Adopted of Human Rights Treaty Bodies, HRI/GEN/3/Add. 1 (Apr. 18, 2002); see also CEDAW, supra note 1, art. 22.

8 Bhattacharya, Dhrubajyoti, The Perils of Simultaneous Adjudication and Consultation: Using the Optional Protocol to CEDAW to Secure Women’s Health, Women’s Rights L. Rep.___(2009) (forthcoming)Google Scholar.