Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:24:24.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks of Diane Orentlicher

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Diane Orentlicher
Diane Orentlicher*
Affiliation:
Washington College of Law, American University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Tension Between Law and Politics: Can the ICC Navigate a Multipolar World?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 107 , 2013 , pp. 425 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court art. 17(l)(d), U.N. Doc. A/CONF. 183/9, as corrected by the procés-verbaux of 10 November 1998 and 12 July 1999, 37 ILM 1002 (1998), 2187 U.N.T.S. 90.

2 ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda may have had this kind of consideration in mind when she indicated soon after taking office that she would emphasize crimes of sexual violence and violence against children.

3 Here, it is more precise to say “applied as consistently as possible,” as every situation potentially warranting ICC engagement is uniquely horrible.

4 The criteria for determining gravity identified in the ICC’s jurisprudence are not as rigid as my argument may at times imply. Nonetheless, maintaining the same criteria for each potential situation serves an important function, even if it is one that seems largely rhetorical: it enables the Court to answer the charge of political selectivity with legally defined criteria.