Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:28:07.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks by Barry Appleton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Barry Appleton*
Affiliation:
Appleton & International Lawyers in Toronto, Canada, and Washington, DC

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Investment Disputes and Nafta Chapter 11
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Higgins, Rosalyn, The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law, 176 Receuii. Des Cours 259 (1982)Google Scholar.

2 See Harza Engineering Co. v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 1 Iran-U.S. Cl. Trib. Rep. 499, 504 (1982).

3 See Tippets, Abbett, McCarthy, Stratton v. TAMS-AFFA Consulting Engineers of Iran, 6 Iran-US. Cl. Trib. Rep. 219, 225 (1984) ; see also Motorola, Inc. v. Iran National Airlines Co., 19 Iran-U.S. Cl. Trib. Rep. 73,95 (1988).

4 See Harza Engineering Co., 1 Iran-U.S. Cl. Trib. Rep. at 504 (1982); ITT Industries, Inc. v. Iran, 2 Iran-U.S. Cl. Trib. Rep, 348, 349 (1983); Tippets, 6 Iran-U.S. Cl. Trib. Rep. at 255 (1984).

5 Santa Elena and Costa Rica, ICSID case No. ARB/96/1/2000, Final Award (Feb. 17, 2000), para. 77, available at <http://www.worldbank.org/icsid/cases/awards.htm>; see arso Bilhoune Marine Drive Comlex, Ltd. v. Ghana Investment Centre and Government of Ghana, 95 ILR 183, 209 (1993).

6 Plurilateral treaties such as the NAFTA go even further than customary international law. See, e.g., North American Free Trade Agreement, Dec. 8-17, 1992, Can.-Mex.-U.S., reprinted in 32 ILM 605 (1993).

7 Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Canada, Interim Award (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib., June 26, 2000), available at <http://www.dfait-maici.gc.ca/tna-nac/nafta-e.asp>.

8 Metalclad Corp. v. Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/l (Aug. 30, 2000), para. Ill, available at <http://www.naftaclaims.com>.

9 Id. para. 103.

10 For example, the Partial Award made by the NAFTA Tribunal in Re: S.D. Myers and Canada, Nov. 13, 2000, cited with approval the Pope & Talbot view on measures tantamount to expropriation. See para. 286 of the majority award, available at <http://www.appletonlaw.com>.