Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:52:36.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Re-Convergence of International Trade and Investment Law: Causes, Questions, and Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joost Pauwelyn
Joost Pauwelyn*
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Trade Law and International Investment Law: Complexity and Coherence
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 108 , 2014 , pp. 255 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 DiMascio, Nicolas & Pauwelyn, Joost, Non-Discrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?, 102 AJIL 48 (2008)Google Scholar.

2 Pauwelyn, Joost, At the Edge of Chaos: Foreign Investment Law as a Complex Adaptive System, How It Emerged and How It Can Be Reformed, 29 ICSID Rev.— Foreign Investment Law Journal (2014) 372–418 Google Scholar.

3 Mobil Invs. Canada, Inc. & Murphy Oil Corp. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Decision on Liability and on Principles of Quantum (May 22, 2012).

4 Pauwelyn, Joost, Dealing with the Increasing Complexity of Investment-Related Treaties: A Framework and Some Policy Guidelines, Investment Treaty News 5–6 (Oct. 2012)Google Scholar, available at http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2012/iisd_itn_october_2012_en.pdf.

5 For an attempt to address these imbalances in access to legal expertise, see .

6 See Pauwelyn, supra note 2.

7 Joost Pauwelyn & Wolfgang Alschner, Forget About the WTO: The Network of Relations Between Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) and ‘Double PTAs,’ in Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements (Manfred Elsig & Andreas Dür eds., forthcoming).