Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:50:21.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Justice Seen to be Done? Electronic Broadcast Coverage of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Paul Mason
Paul Mason*
Affiliation:
Centre for Media & Justice, Southampton, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reflections of International Law in Popular Culture
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 95 , 2001 , pp. 210 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See generally, Geoffrey Pearson, Hooligan: A History of Respectable Fears (1983).

2 Ronald Goldfarb, Tv Or Not Tv: Television, Justice and the Courts 88 (1995); Brill, Steven, Cameras Belonging the Courtroom, 125 USA Today Mag. 52 (1996)Google Scholar; Lassiter, Christo J., TV or not TV—That Is the Question, 86 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 928 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Luft, Greg, Stopping the Circus: “Dignified” Coverage of the Oklahoma City Case, 35 Colum. Journalism Rev. 11 (1997)Google Scholar; Trigobov, Daniel, Court Coverage Hindered by of Backlash? Simpson Debacle Has Changed the Landscape/or Cameras in Courtrooms, 127 Broadcast & Cable 24 (1997)Google Scholar.

3 People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson 4 October 1995.

4 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Louise Woodward 6 October 1997.

5 Altheide, David, TV News and the Social Construction of Justice: Research Issues and Policy, in Justice and the Media: Issues and Research (Surette, Ray ed. 1984)Google Scholar; Barber, Susanna, The Problem of Prejudice: A New Approach to Assessing the Impact of Courtroom Cameras, 66 Judicature 248 (1983)Google Scholar; Clark, Charles S., Courts and the Media, 4 CQ Researcher 817 (1994)Google Scholar. But see Burgi, Michael, Case Dismissed: Networks Maneuver to Expand Coverage of Trials Despite Camera Bans, 5 Mediaweek 16 (1995)Google Scholar; Denniston, Lyle, Are Federal Cases Headed for Television, 16 Am. Journalism Rev. 50 (1994)Google Scholar; Gersh-Hernandez, Debra, Courtroom Cameras Debated, 129 Editor & Publisher 11 (1996)Google Scholar.

6 Dan Hogan & Paul Mason, Let the People See the Lockerbie Trial, Times (London), Feb. 9, 1999, at 21; N. Catliff, Trust the People, Guardian, Feb. 7, 2000, at 4; Paul Mason, Five Reasons to Televise the Lockerbie Trial, in Head to Head Cameras in Court (BBC television broadcast, Feb. 22,2000), available at <http://news.bbc.co.uk/ hi/english/uk/newsid%5F652000/652173.stm>; BBC Loses Lockerbie TV Case (BBC television broadcast, Mar. 3, 2000), available at <http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/scotland/newsis_668000/668337.stm>.

7 Fact Sheet on ICTY Proceedings, Apr. 18, 2001, available at <http://www.un.org/icty/glance/profact-e.htmx>

8 SC Res. 827, Arts. 2-5 (May 25, 1993), reprinted in 32 ILM 1203 (1993).