Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:09:26.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2019

David Bigge  and
Penelope Nevill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How judges and arbitrators in international courts and tribunals do or ought to judge are perennial topics. For the 2018 ASIL Annual Meeting, we assembled a panel of judges, practitioners, and scholars for an informal conversation on the modern, practical aspects of judging in international courts and in arbitral tribunals.

Type
The Practice of Judging
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 112 , 2018 , pp. 237
Copyright
Copyright © by The American Society of International Law 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This panel was convened at 1:00 p.m., Friday, April 6, 2018, by its moderator, David Bigge, Deputy Legal Counselor, Embassy The Hague and U.S. Agent to the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, who introduced the panelists: Sir Christopher Greenwood, Judge, Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal; Holger P. Hestermeyer, Shell Reader in International Dispute Resolution, The Dickson Poon School of Law, King’s College London; Kimberly Prost, Judge, International Criminal Court; Garth Schofield, Senior Legal Counsel, Permanent Court of Arbitration; Eduardo Silva Romero, Partner and Co-Chair of International Arbitration Practice, Dechert LLP; and Philippa Webb, Barrister, 20 Essex Street Chambers and Associate Professor of Public International Law, The Dickson Poon School of Law, King’s College London.