Article contents
Elihu Root, James Brown Scott and the Early Years of the ASIL
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Lawyers as Statesmen: Twentieth-Century U.S. Attitudes Toward International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015
References
1 James Brown Scott, Remarks from the Chair, 7 ASIL Proc. 1, 3 (1913). The case, Russia v. Turkey, is reported in 7 AJIL 178 (1913), and in James Brown Scott, The Hague Court Reports 298 (1916).
2 ASJL Proc. 268 (1909).
3 Elihu Root, The Need of Popular Understanding of International Law, 1 AJIL 1, 2–3 1907.
4 Proceedings of the Second Conf. of Teachers of International Law and Related Subjects, Apr. 23–25,1925, at 142–43 (1926).
5 Manley O. Hudson, International Tribunals: Past and Future 238 (1944).
6 See 2 Philip C. Jessup, Euhu Root 70–75 (1938).
7 James Brown Scott, Elihu Root: An Appreciation, 31 ASIL Proc. 1,8 (1937).
8 Declaration by the Council upon the Subject of International Law, 12 ASIL Proc. 14, 15 (1918).
9 On the “Root Court,“ see Michael Dunne, The United States and the World Court, 1920–1935, at 17–52 (1988).
10 Report of the American Delegation to the Conference on the Limitation of Armaments, Feb. 9, 1922, in 16 AJIL 159, 189 (1922).
11 Conference of American Teachers of International Law held at Washington D.C., Apr. 23–25, 1914, at 70 (1914), reprinted in 8 ASIL Proc. 250, 319 (1914).
12 Report of the Standing Committee on the Study and Teaching of International Law and Related Subjects, 10 ASIL Proc. 174–75 (1916).
13 James Brown Scott, Remarks as Toastmaster at the Annual Banquet, 24 ASIL Proc. 243, 244 (1930).
14 Originally, the second of these objects referred only to the establishment of international relations on the basis of law and justice. The words “and maintenance“ were added later to the Society's Constitution.
- 2
- Cited by