Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:33:38.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Fifth Session
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 23 , 1929 , pp. 119 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conference, Conference of 1907, Vol. I, p. 466.

2 Ibid., p. 537.

3 Paris Temps, March 17, 1929.

4 P. C. I. J., Documents Concerning Action Taken by the Council of the League under Article 14 of the Covenant, p. 38.

5 There were some states, not of the greatest world powers, which did conclude arbitration treaties without stated reservations before 1914. Perhaps the best example is the agreement of November 20, 1909, between Italy and The Netherlands, a text of which is in Recueil des Traites et Conventions Conclus par le Royaume des Pays-Bas (Lagemans-Breukelmann), p. 1035.

6 253 U. S. 61.

7 Discussed in “Reservation Clauses in Agreements for Obligatory Arbitration,” AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, Vol. XXIII, pp. 68-93.

8 Illustrated in the Postal Conventions of 1874 and 1891 (18 U. S. Stats., 585,1093).

9 League of Nations Treaty Series, No. 1558.

10 Cf. Treaty of November 30, 1926, between Denmark and Czechoslovakia, which is equally broad in its scope (L. N. T. S. No. 1541); also the Treaty of April 30, 1926, between Sweden and Belgium (L. N. T. S. 1540).

11 L. N. T. S. Nos. 1293, 1294, 1295, 1296.

12 U. S. Treaty Series No. 768 (with Finland); No. 770 (with Albania); No. 774 (with Germany).

13 L. N. T. S. Nos. 1192, 1235, 1242, 1417, 1418, 1420.

14 Illustrated in the second article of the Polish-Swedish Treaty of November 3, 1925(L. N. T. S. No. 1466).

15 L. N. T. S. No. 1171 (Treaty between Poland and Czechoslovakia).

16 Illustrated in a general treaty of arbitration between the Argentine Republic and Venezuela (L. N. T. S. 715).

17 Illustrated in the treaty of April 5, 1927, between Italy and Hungary (L. N. T. S. No. 1561), and in the Convention of Nov. 11, 1927, between France and Jugoslavia (L. N. T. S. 1593).

18 U. S. Treaties cited above; Swiss-Japanese Treaty of December 26, 1924 (L. N. T. S. No. 1072); British-Dutch Convention (renewal), in L. N. T. S. No. 977.

19 See Germany‘s treaty with The Netherlands (L. N. T. S. 1527); with Sweden (L. N. T. S. No. 1036); with Estonia (L. N. T. S. 1484).

20 Annuaire, XXIX, 259. Cf. previous discussions, XXIV, 224-230, XXV, 397-411.

21 P. C. I. J., Documents Concerning Action Taken by the League Council, p. 194.

22 Text in Conference on Central American Affairs, 1922-23, pp. 296-313.

23 See Art. 7 of the Treaty of May 20, 1926, between Germany and The Netherlands.

24 23See Art. 18 of the Swiss-Belgian Treaty of 1927 (L. N. T. S. 1567).

25 See L. N. T. S. Nos. 1561, 1593, 1610.

26 See Belgian-Swedish Treaty (L. N. T. S. 1540).

27 See Art. 3 of the Polish-Swiss Treaty of 1925 (L. N. T. S. 1466).

28 See L. N. T. S. 888, and an apparently opposite rule in Nos. 1374, 1527.

29 Art. 23 of the German-Swedish Treaty of 1924 (L. N. T. S. 1036).

30 Art. 19 of the Belgian-Swedish Treaty of 1926 (L. N. T. S. 1540).

31 Address of Hon. Charles Evans Hughes, reported in N. Y. Times, March 24,1929, Sec. 2, p. 1.