No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Observations on Proposed Amendments to United States Constitution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Fourth Session
- Information
- Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 48 , 1954 , pp. 128 - 141
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1954
References
1 Address at Louisville, Ky., April 12, 1952, American Bar Association Regional Meeting.
2 Arnold D. McNair, The Law of Treaties, British Practice and Opinion (1939).
3 Taylor v. Morton, 2 Curtis 454, affirmed by Supreme Court, 2 Black 481.
4 Treaties and Constitutional Law, Property Interferences and Due Process of Law (1941), pp. 83-84.
5 U. S. v. Darby (1941), 312 U. S. 100, 124.
6 10 Jefferson, Writings (Lib. ed. 1903), p. 419.
7 New Orleans v. U. S., 10 Peters 662, 736.
8 Missouri v. Holland (1920), 252 U. 8. 416.
9 American Journal of International Law, Vol. 14 (1920), p. 402. In his capacity as Counsel and Adviser to the State Department under Mr. Boot, Mr. Anderson prepared a Report on the Extent and Limitations of the Treaty-Making Power, which was approved by Mr. Root and relied upon by him in his settlement of outstanding questions between the United States and Canada and other nations. Mr. Anderson’s Report was printed as an article in the American Journal of International Law, Vol. 1 (1907), p. 636.
10 Proceedinos, American Society of International Law, 1929, pp. 194-196.
11 Goodrieh and Hambro, Charter of the United Nations (1949), pp. 111, 113, 120.
12 Mr. John P. Humphrey, in Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, January, 1948.
13 The Constitution and World Organization (Princeton University Press, 1944), p. 30.
14 See Morley, Felix, Treaty Law and the Constitution (N. Y.), pp. 36–37 Google Scholar.
15 Charles Malik, in the United Nations Bulletin, Sept. 1, 1952, pp. 248-253.
16 Our Foreign Policy, Department of State Publication 3972, September, 1950.
17 See editorial by Briggs, Herbert W. in American Journal of International Law, Vol. 40 (1946), p. 376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 U. S. v. Belmont (1937), 301 U. S. 324, and U. S. v. Pink (1942), 315 U. S. 203.
19 “The Litvinov Assignment and the Pink Case,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 36 (1942), p. 282.
20 Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. et al. v. Sawyer, 343 U. S. 579.