Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:41:59.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Address of Prof. Charles Noble Gregory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Friday Evening, April 19, 1907
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1907-1917) , Volume 1 , 1907 , pp. 149 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wheaton’s Inter. Law, § 538 et seq., 4th ed., 1904. Same, edited with notes by R. H. Dana (1866), p. 714.

2 Scott’s Cases on Inter. Law, p. 412 et seq.

3 2d ed., § 138.

4 Vol. V, p. 158 et seq.

5 Same, p. 233.

6 Same, p. 371.

7 Butler’s Treaty-Making Power, Vol. I, § 200 and notes.

8 Butler’s Treaty-Making Power, Vol. I, §§ 207, 208, 209, 210, citing Elliott’s Debates, Vol. IV, pp. 253 to 340.

9 Same, § 216, citing Elliott’s Debates, Vol. III, p. 499.

10 Butleťs Treaty-Making Power, Vol. I, § 226, citing Elliott’s Debates, Vol. II, p. 287.

11 Butler’s Treaty-Making Power, Vol. I, § 228, citing Elliott’s Debates, Vol. IV, p. 119.

12 Butler’s Treaty-Making Power, Vol. I, § 239 et seq.

13 Kent in Lecture XIII, pp. 286–7. Story’s Commentaries on Constitution, II, § 1502. Both quoted Butler’s Treaty-Making Power, § 309 and notes.

14 Butler’s Treaty-Making Power of United States, Vol. I, p. 447.

15 3 Dallas (U. S. Sup.), 199.

16 Treaty-Making Power of the United States, Vol. II, p. 7.

17 3 Dallas, p. 284.

18 Treaty-Making Power of the United States, Vol. II, p. 10.

19 See Maegruder’s American Statesmen, John Marshall, p. 38. My attention has been kindly called to this by Mr. J. J. Lamb. Patrick Henry does not appear as counsel in this case in the report, but his participation is also mentioned by Mr. Carson in his History of the Supreme Court, p. 169. See Butler’s Treaty-Making Power, § 330, note 1.

20 Treaty-Making Power of the United States, Vol. II, p. 11.

21 3 Cranch, 454.

22 7 Cranch, 603.

23 Martin, Heir and Devisee of Fairfax, v. Hunter’s Lessee, 1 Wheat., 304 (1816). Smith v. Md., 6 Cranch, 286.

24 2 Wheat., 259.

25 4 Wheat., 453.

26 Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. Hartland, 2 Paine, 536; Same v. Wheeler, 2 Matthews, 105; State of Vermont v. Soc. for Prop, of the Gospel, Fed. Cases, 16, 19, 20; Soc., etc., v. Town of New Haven, 8 Wheat., 464; Treaty-Making Power of the United States, Vol. II, p. 12.

27 9 Wheaton, 489.

28 14 Peters, 353.

29 5 Wallace, 737.

30 The New York Indians, 5 Wallace, 761 (1866).

31 100 U. S., 483.

32 133 U. S., 258.

33 Butler’s Treaty-Making Power, § 336.

34 Baker v. City of Portland, 5 Sawyer, 566; Federal Cases, 777.

35 In re Tiburcio Parrott, 6 Sawyer, 349.

36 In re Ah Ohong, 6 Sawyer, 451.

37 Ho Ah Kow v. Nunan, 5 Sawyer, 552.

38 13 Fed. R., 229.

39 In re Race Horse, 70 Fed. R., 598.

40 Ward v. Race Horse, 163 U. S., 504; and see dissent by Mr. Justice Brown.

41 123 U. S., 131.

42 124 U. S., 394; and see In re Shibuya Jugiro, 140 U. S., 291.

43 136 U. S.., 436.

44 16 N. Y., 203.

45 Butler’s Treaty-Making Power, § 356.

46 21 Howard, 366.

47 Compagnie Française v. State Board of Health, 51 La. Ann., 645.

48 22 Sup. Ct. R., 811.

49 1 Cal., 232 (1850).

50 5 Cal., 381 (1855). Some extracts from this case are printed on page 7 of the brief of William G. Burke, Esq., City Attorney, and attorney for the respondents in the case of Keikichi Aoki, by Michitusgu Aoki, his guardian ad litem, v. M. A. Deane, Principal of Redding Primary School, in the city and county of San Francisco, involving the school rights of Japanese children lately pending in the Supreme Court of California, which the writer has had the privilege of examining.

51 127 Cal., 431.

52 Jackson v. Wright, 4 Johnson Cases, 75 (1809); Kull v. Kull, 37 Hun., 476; Adams v. Akerland, 168 Ill., 632; Schultze v. Schultze, 144 Ill., 290; Opel v. Shoup, 100 Ia., 407; Doeherd v. Hilmer, 102 Ia., 169; Meier v. Lee, 106 Ia., 303; Cornet v. Winton’s Lessee, 2 Yerger, 143; Maiden v. Ingersoll, 6 Mich. 373.

53 Bahnand v. Bize, 105 Fed. 485 (1901) ; Doe v. Roe, 55 Atl., 341 (Del., 1903).

54 In re Fattostini’s Est., 67 N. Y. S., 1119; In re Lobrasciana’s Est, 77 N. Y. S., 1040; In re Wyman, 77 N. E., 379.

55 95 U. S., 465 (1877).

56 5 Cranch, 344 (1809).

57 20 Sup. Ct. R., 873.

58 21 Sup. Ct. E., 390.

59 22 Sup. Ct. R., 195 (1902).

60 See index Treaties in Force, 1904.

61 Vol. 2, pp. 192–193.

62 See title “ Boundaries,” in index to “ Treaties in Force in 1904.”

63 14 Peters, 4 (1840).

64 Cited by Mr. A. K. Kuhn, Columbian Law Review, March, 1907, p. 179.

65 Scott’s Cases International Law, p. 328, note. Moore’s International Law Dig., Vol. VI, p. 837. And see the same vol., pp. 605 to 1037, title “ Claims,” for full review of many like cases.

66 1 Wheaton, 304.

67 Clarke v. Harwood, 3 Dallas, 342; Shanks v. Dupont, 3 Peters, 242 (1830); Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U. S., 275 (1875); Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 U. S., 483 (1879).

68 6 Sawyer, 349.

69 See In re Quong Woo, 13 Fed., 229.

70 24 Sup. Ct. R., 657.

71 5 Sawyer, 552; 12 Fed. Cases, Case No. 6546.

72 Society for Prop, of the Gospel v. New Haven, 8 Wheat., 464; Carver v. Jackson, 4 Peters, 1 (1830) ; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat., 259 (1817).

73 Hopkirk v. Bell, 3 Cranch, 454; Higginson v. Mein, 4 Cranch, 415; Hughes v. Edwards, 9 Wheat., 489 (1824).

74 Craig v. Bradford, 3 Wheaton, 594 (1818).

75 Geoffroy v. Riggs, 133 U. S., 258 (1889).

76 Baker v. Portland, 5 Sawyer, 566; 2 Fed. Cases, Case No. 777.

77 168 Mass. 188 (1897).

78 Norberg v. Hillgren, 5 N. Y. Legal Obs., 177; The Elwine Kreplin, 9 Blatch.

C.C., 438; The Salamoni, 29 Fed. R., 534; The Burchard, 42 Fed. R., 608; The Marie, 49 Fed. R., 286 ; The Welhaven, 55 Fed. R., 80.

79 See note Scott’s Cases International Law, p. 328.

80 Tucker v. Alexandroff, 22 Sup. Ct. R., 195.

81 Columbia Law Review, February, 1907, p. 92.

82 158 U. S.; 564; 15 S. Ct. R., 900 and 1039.