Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:59:47.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(P1-26) Abdominal Trauma: Arteriography versus Laparotomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2011

S. Abrassart
Affiliation:
Orthopédie, geneve 4, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Selective non-operative management of abdominal visceral lesions is one of the most important and challenging changes that occurred in trauma patient care over the last 20 years. The main advantage of this type of management is the avoidance of unnecessary/non-therapeutic laparotomies. Trauma surgeons who deal with this type of treatment are worried of missed abdominal injuries. Modern diagnostic tools (spiral computed tomography, ultrasound, angiography, laparoscopy) allow trauma surgeons to accurately characterize the lesions to be addressed non-operatively. This presentation discusses the main elements of selective, non-operative management of principle solid visceral lesions (liver, spleen, and kidney). The advantages and limitations of the main diagnostic instruments used for evaluation of trauma patients allocated to non-operative management will be highlighted. Polytrauma patients in a Leve-1 trauma center over the last five years were selected and outcomes were analyzed. Pancreatic trauma remains an operative injury. However, surgeons must temper the enthusiasm for non-operative management of patients with solid organ injury, and exclude patients who would best be treated with surgery from this management scheme. Emergency care of the patients according the golden hour and team ability must be considered.

Type
Poster Abstracts 17th World Congress for Disaster and Emergency Medicine
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2011