Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:59:32.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethics and the Human Genome Diversity Project: An African Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Trefor Jenkins
Trefor Jenkins*
Affiliation:
South African Institute for Medical Research, South Africa
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Human Genome Diversity Project
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , September 1999 , pp. 308 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

British Medical Association (1999). Biotechnology, Weapons and Humanity. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. et al. (1991). “Call for a Worldwide Survey of Human Genetic Diversity: A Vanishing Opportunity for the Human Genome.” Genomics 11: 490.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. et al. (1994). The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, A.J. (1997). “Limits to Genetic Research? Human Diversity Intelligence and Race.” In Harper, P.S. and Clarke, A. J. (eds.), Genetics, Society and Clinical Practice. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (1993). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs and Steel. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Galston, A.W. (1972). “Science and Social Responsibility: A Case History”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 196: 223–35.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J. (1999). “Darwin's More Stately Mansion.” Editorial. Science 284: 2087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirszfeld, L. and Hirszfeld, H. (1919). “Serological Differences between the Blood of Different Races.” Lancet 2: 675–79.Google Scholar
Human Genome Organization (HUGO) (1994). The Human Genome Diversity (HGD) Project: SUMMARY DOCUMENT.Google Scholar
Kerin, J. (1999). “Genetic Research and Biological Weapons: The Ethics of the Human Genome Project.” Monash Bioethics Review 18 (3): 1–10, Ethics Committee Supplement.Google Scholar
Masood, E. (1999). “Sequence Terrorist Genes', Says Venter.” Nature 397: 281.Google Scholar
Monash Bioethics Review (1999). Vol 18, No 3Ethics Committee Supplement: pages11–17. Excerpts from the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Report on the Country's Chemical and Biological Warfare Research Programme.Google Scholar
National Research Council, Committee on Human Genome Diversity (1997). The Human Genome Diversity Project. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, D.B. (1999). “The Human Genome Diversity Project: Ethical Problems and Solutions.” Politics and the Life Sciences 18: 15–23.Google Scholar
Schüklenk, U. (1999). “International Research Ethics Guidelines To Be Revised—In Nearly Complete Secrecy.” Monash Bioethics Review 18 (3): 18–21, Ethics Committee Supplement.Google Scholar
UNESCO International Bioethics Committee (1995). Report of Population Genetics Sub-Committee. UNESCO.Google Scholar
World Medical Association (1996). Declaration of Helsinki. Ferney-Voltaire, France: World Medical Association.Google Scholar