Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:28:13.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solidarity without “Sisterhood”? Feminism and the Ethics of Coalition Building

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2006

Brenda Lyshaug
Brenda Lyshaug
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many feminist theorists have embraced coalition building as the central model for feminist political mobilization. They have done so because they believe that coalitional solidarity resolves a long-standing impasse within feminism between the political claims of diversity among women and the political need for unity. In this essay, I argue that the turn to coalition politics within feminist theory is problematic: While coalitional solidarity honors the claims of diversity among women, it ignores the importance of acknowledging commonality. The tactical ties that it encompasses fail to enact the kind of mutual recognition on which feminism, as a movement for social justice, depends. I show that in order to address both the concern with diversity and the need for unity in a satisfying way, theorists of solidarity must supplement their appeal to coalition building with an account of the ethical and affective preconditions of inclusive political ties. Specifically, I argue that the cultivation of “enlarged sympathy” among feminist political actors is crucial to the establishment of political bonds that accommodate and affirm important differences among women.The author would like to thank the following individuals for helpful comments and discussions: Farid Abdel-Nour, Cheryl Hall, Kimberly Lau, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, and the editors and anonymous reviewers at Politics & Gender. An earlier version of this article was presented as a paper in San Francisco at the American Political Science Association's annual meeting in 2001.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 77 - 100
Copyright
© 2006 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands/La Frontera. [1987] 1999. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
Bartky, Sandra. 1997. “Sympathy and Solidarity: On a Tightrope with Scheler.” In Feminists Rethink the Self, ed. D. T. Meyers. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 177–96.
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self. New York: Routledge.
Bickford, Susan. 1997. “Anti-Anti-Identity Politics: Feminism, Democracy, and the Complexities of Citizenship.” Hypatia 12 (4): 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
Dean, Jodi. 1996. Solidarity of Strangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dean, Jodi. 1997. “Feminist Solidarity, Reflective Solidarity: Theorizing Connections after Identity Politics.” Women & Politics 18 (4): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deveaux, Monique. 1999. “Agonism and Pluralism.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 25 (4): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 1997. “‘Please Sit Down, but Don't Make Yourself at Home’: Arendtian ‘Visiting’ and the Prefigurative Politics of Consciousness-Raising.” In Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, ed. C. Calhoun and J. McGowan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 132–65.
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice Interruptus. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, Donna. 1985. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.” Socialist Review 80: 65–108.Google Scholar
Heyes, Cressida. 2003. “Feminist Solidarity after Queer Theory: The Case of Transgender.” Signs 28 (4): 1093–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
hooks, bell. 1984. “Sisterhood: Political Solidarity Between Women.” In Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.
Kateb, George. 1992. The Inner Ocean. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kateb, George. 1995. Emerson and Self-Reliance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kaufman, Moises, et al. 2001. The Laramie Project. New York: Vintage.
Kristeva, Julia. 1991. Strangers to Ourselves. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kristeva, Julia. 1993. Nations without Nationalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kruks, Sonia. 2001. Retrieving Experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lugones, Maria. 1990. “Playfulness, ‘World-Traveling,’ and Loving Perception.” In Making Face, Making Soul, ed. G. Anzaldúa. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books, 390–402.
Lugones, Maria, and Elizabeth Spelman. 1990. “Have We Got a Theory for You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism and the Demand for ‘the Woman's Voice.’” In Hypatia Reborn, ed. A. Y. al-Hibri and M. A. Simons. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 18–33.
Molina, Papusa. 1990. “Recognizing, Accepting, and Celebrating our Differences.” In Making Face, Making Soul, ed. G. Anzaldúa. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books, 326–31.
Morrison, Toni. 1970. The Bluest Eye. New York: Plume.
Mouffe, Chantal. 1992. “Feminism, Citizenship, and Radical Democratic Politics.” In Feminists Theorize the Political, ed. J. Butler and J. Scott, 369–84.
Reagon, Bernice Johnson. 2000 [1983]. “Coalition Politics: Turning the Century.” In Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthology, ed. B. Smith. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 343–56.
Scheler, Max. 1954. The Nature of Sympathy. Trans. P. Heath. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1997. Fruits of Sorrow. Boston: Beacon Press.
Tronto, Joan. 1994. Moral Boundaries. New York: Routledge.
White, Stephen. 2000. Sustaining Affirmation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wyatt, Jean. 2004. “Toward Cross-Race Dialogue: Identification, Misrecognition, and Difference in Feminist Multicultural Community.” Signs 29 (3): 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Young, Iris. 1995. “Together in Difference: Transforming the Logic of Group Political Conflict.” In The Rights of Minority Cultures, ed. Will Kymlicka. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, Iris. 1997. “Asymmetrical Reciprocity: On Moral Respect, Wonder, and Enlarged Thought.” In Intersecting Voices. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 38–59.