Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:38:34.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multilevel Analyses of Comparative Data: A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Nathaniel Beck*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, New York University, New York, NY. e-mail: [email protected]

Extract

The articles in this special issue all use multilevel methods to study comparative political behavior. This is obviously a good thing, for both methodology and comparative politics. Clearly comparative politics means comparing things and not just studying nations other than the United States. This is equally true of micropolitical studies. These articles all do a very nice job of showing how one can do comparative micropolitics (and tie together micro and macro variables).

Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N. 2004. “Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series-Cross-Section Data.” Social Science Working Paper 1205. Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Bryk, A. S., and Raudenbush, S. W. 1992. Hierarchical Linear Models, Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., and Stevenson, Randy. 2005. “Context and the Economic Vote: A Multilevel Analysis.” Political Analysis. doi:10.1093/pan/mpi028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swamy, P. A. V. B. 1971. Statistical Inference in Random Coefficient Models. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar