Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:13:10.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The over-winter movements of a chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Rory P. Wilson
Affiliation:
Institut für Meereskunde, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, D–24105 Kiel, Germany
Boris M. Culik
Affiliation:
Institut für Meereskunde, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, D–24105 Kiel, Germany
Piotr Kosiorek
Affiliation:
Department of Antarctic Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ustrzycka 10, 02–141 Warsaw, Poland
Dieter Adelung
Affiliation:
Institut für Meereskunde, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, D–24105 Kiel, Germany

Abstract

A single chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica), which had moulted at the South Shetland Islands, was subsequently tracked during 120 days at sea in the austral winter using a global location system (geolocation) based on light intensity. The bird moved east along the Scotia Ridge to a point approximately 300 km west of the South Sandwich Islands and approximately 1600 km away from the colony in which it had moulted. It spent more than 60% of its time in open water north of the edge of the pack ice.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, D.G., O'Conner, E.F., and Boekelheide, R.J.. 1984. The marine ecology of the birds of the Ross Sea, Antarctica. American Ornithologists Union Monographs 32: 197.Google Scholar
Bannasch, R., Wilson, R.P., and Culik, B.. 1994. Hydrodynamic aspects of design and attachment of a backmounted device in penguins. Journal of Experimental Biology 194: 8396.Google Scholar
Bierman, W.H., and Voous, K.H.. 1950. Birds observed and collected during the whaling expeditions of the Willem Barentz in the Antarctic, 1946–47 and 1947–48. Ardea 37 (Supplement): 1123.Google Scholar
Bost, C.A., Georges, J.Y., Guinet, C., Cherel, Y., Pütz, K., Charrassin, J.-B., Handrich, Y., Zorn, T., Lage, J., and Le Maho, Y.. 1997. Foraging habitat and food intake of satellite-tracked king penguins during the summer at Crozet Archipelago, Southern Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 150: 2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, D.R., Siniff, D.B., and Erickson, A.W.. 1969. Summer birds of the pack ice of the Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Auk 86:701716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croxall, J.P., and Davis, L.S.. In press. Penguins: paradoxes and patterns. Marine Ornithology.Google Scholar
Davis, L.S., Boersma, P.D., and Court, G.S.. 1996. Satellite telemetry of the winter migration of Adelie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae). Polar Biology 16: 221225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enticott, J.W. 1984. New and rarely recorded birds at Gough Island, March 1982–December 1983. Cormorant 12: 7581.Google Scholar
Enticott, J.W. 1986. Distribution of penguins at sea in the southeastern Atlantic and southwestern Indian oceans. Cormorant 13: 118142.Google Scholar
Fraser, W.R., Trivelpiece, W.Z., Ainley, D.G., and Trivelpiece, S.G.. 1992. Increases in Antarctic penguin populations: reduced competition with whales or a loss of sea ice due to environmental warming. Polar Biology 11:525531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haftorn, S., Somme, L., and Gray, J.. 1981. Census of seals and penguins at Bouvet. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 175: 2935.Google Scholar
Harris, M.P. 1982. Seabird counts made during a crossing of the southern Indian and Atlantic oceans. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin 55: 105109.Google Scholar
Heinemann, D., Hunt, G., and Everson, I.. 1989. Relationships between the distributions of marine avian predators and their prey, Euphausea superba, in Bransfield Strait and southern Drake Passage. Marine Ecology Progress Series 58: 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R.D. 1994. Theory of geolocation by light levels. In: Le Boeuf, B.J., and Laws, R.M. (editors). Elephant seals: population ecology, behavior and physiology. Berkeley: University of California Press: 227236.Google Scholar
Jouventin, P., Capdeville, D., Cuenot-Chaillet, F., and Boiteau, C.. 1994. Exploitation of pelagic resources by a non-flying seabird: satellite tracking of the king penguin throughout the breedingcycle. Marine Ecology Progress Series 86: 297300.Google Scholar
Kerry, K.R., Clarke, J.R., and Else, G.D.. 1995. The foraging range of Adélie penguins at Bechervaise Island, Mac. Robertson Land, Antarctica, as determined by satellite telemetry. In: Dann, P., Norman, I., and Reilly, P. (editors). Thepenguins. Chipping Norton, Australia: Surrey Beatty and Sons: 216243.Google Scholar
Kock, K.H., and Reinsch, H.H.. 1978. Ornithological observations during the German Antarctic Expedition 1975–1976. Beitrage Vogelkunde, Leipzig 24: 305328.Google Scholar
Thiel, H. 1996. Die Teifsee und ihre Einbindung in ein globales System. Meer und Museum 12: 5160.Google Scholar
Thomas, T., and Bretagnolle, V.. 1988. Non-breeding birds of Pointe Geologie Archipelago, Adélie Land, Antarctica. Emu 88: 104106.Google Scholar
Thurson, M.H. 1982. Ornithological observations in the South Atlantic Ocean and Weddell Sea, 1959–64. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin 55: 77104.Google Scholar
Watson, G.E., Angle, J.P., Harper, P.C., Bridge, M.A., Schlatter, R.P., Tickell, W.L.N., Boyd, J.C., and Boyd, M.M.. 1971. Birds of the Antarctic and subantarctic. American Geographic Society Antarctica Map Folio Series 14:118.Google Scholar
Williams, T.D. (editor). 1995. Thepenguins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.P. 1995. The foraging ecology of penguins. In: Williams, T.D. (editor). The penguins. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 81106.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.P., Culik, B.M., Coria, N.R., Spairani, H.J., and Adelung, D.. 1991. Packages for attachment to seabirds; which color do Adélie penguins dislike least? Journal of Wildlife Management 57: 447451.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.P., Ducamp, J.J., Rees, G., Culik, B., and Niekamp, K.. 1992. Estimation of location: global coverage using light intensity. Wildlife telemetry: remote monitoring and tracking of animals. Chichester: Ellis Horward: 131134.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.P., Putz, K., Peters, G., Culik, B., Scolaro, J.A., Charrassin, J.-B., and Ropert-Coudert, Y.. 1997. Long term attachment of transmitting and recording devices to penguins and other seabirds. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:101106.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.P., Rees, G., Lage, J., Pütz, K., Kierspel, M., Cooper, J., Bost, C.A., and Culik, B.. In press. Determination of animal position using changes in diel light intensity. Proceedings V European Conference on Wildlife Telemetry.Google Scholar
Woehler, E.J. 1993. The distribution and abundance of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic penguins. Cambridge: SCAR.Google Scholar
Zamon, J.E., Greene, C.H., Meir, E., Demer, D.A., Hewitt, R.P., and Sexton, S.. 1996. Acoustic characterization of the three-dimensional prey field of foraging chinstrap penguins. Marine Ecology Progress Series 131:110.Google Scholar