Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:20:04.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Triumphs and Travails of a Cold War Remedy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

The cold war, many people contend, ended sometime around 1989. A number of facts, such as the United States' military hegemony, the demise of the Soviet empire, and China's impeccable capitalist record, tend to corroborate this contention. Yet, with all due respect to the memory of John Adams, stubbornness is not the privilege solely of facts. Certain mind-sets can prove just as obstinate. Dormant or sidestepped during most of the 1990s, cold war mentalities and their mantras—“trace all evil to the main enemy,” “don't let your base be troubled by nuance and ambiguity”—have indeed made a great comeback since the beginning of the new millennium, and their mouthpieces are working hard to turn George W. Bush's post-9/11 pronouncement “You are either with us or you are against us …” into a self-fulfilling prophecy (“President”). To ward off the return of these disciplinary strictures, it is tempting to resort to probably the most powerful cold war remedy of the 1970s and 1980s—namely, human rights discourse and activism. Has this remedy retained its potency in the current context? Addressing this question—or at least stressing its urgency—is the main ambition of the following pages.

Type
Little-Known Documents
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Tariq, Ali, ed. Masters of the Universe? NATO's Balkan Crusade. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar
Mario, Bettati. Le droit d'ingerence: Mutation dans l'ordre international. Paris: Jacob, 1996.Google Scholar
Blair Calls for Chechnya Probe.” BBC News. 11 Mar. 2000. 24 Aug. 2006 <http://news.bbc.co.Uk/2/hi/europe/673978.stm>..>Google Scholar
Clinton, William Jefferson. “Address to the Nation by the President.” 10 June 1999. Welcome to the White House. 24 Aug. 2006 <http://clinton2.nara.gov/WH/New/Europe-9906/html/Speeches/990610.html>..>Google Scholar
Clinton, William Jefferson. “President Clinton's Online Interview with CNN.com.” With Wolf Blitzer. CNN.com. 14 Feb. 2000. Cable News Network. 24 Aug. 2006 <http://archives.cnn.com/2000/US/02/14/clinton.transcript/>.Google Scholar
Thomas, Cushman, ed. A Matter of Principle: Humanitarian Arguments for War in Iraq. Berkeley: U of California P, 2005.Google Scholar
Mark, Danner. “Clinton, the UN, and the Bosnian Disaster.” New York Review of Books 18 Dec. 1997. <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/974>.Google Scholar
Lauren, Paul Gordon. The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1998.Google Scholar
Samantha, Powers. A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. New York: Basic, 2003.Google Scholar
President Welcomes President Chirac to White House.” The White House: President George W. Bush. 6 Nov. 2001. 19 July 2006 <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011106-4.html>..>Google Scholar
Paul, Wolfowitz. “Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz Interview with Karen DeYoung, Washington Post.” U.S. Department of Defense. 29 May 2003. 24 Aug. 2006 <http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/tr20030528-depsecdef0222.html>..>Google Scholar