Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:21:49.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alison's Incapacity and Poetic Instability in the Wife of Bath's Tale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Susan Crane
Susan Crane*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chaucer's Wife of Bath longs to counter the assertion of antifeminist satire that women's authority over men is noxious and undeserved. At first it seems that for her tale she chooses romance as the genre that can imagine a worthy sovereignty of secular women, yet she undermines romantic elevation by frequently returning to satiric stances. The generic mixing in her tale signals that romance is inadequate to her argument and indeed that no conventional discourse sustains women's sovereignty. Alison attempts to reach beyond the discourses available to her by destabilizing gender, genre, and gentillesse in her narration, intimating that these categories are flexible and open to new meanings.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 102 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 20 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Aers, David. Chaucer, Langland and the Creative Imagination. London: Routledge, 1980.Google Scholar
Bloch, R. Howard. Medieval French Literature and Law. Berkeley: U of California P, 1977.Google Scholar
Bolton, Whitney. “The Wife of Bath: Narrator as Victim.” Women and Literature ns 1 (1980): 54–65.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. “The Wife of Bath and the Painting of Lions.” PMLA 94 (1979): 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. Robinson, F. N. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton, 1957.Google Scholar
de Pizan, Christine. The Book of the City of Ladies. Trans. Richards, Earl Jeffrey. New York: Persea, 1982.Google Scholar
Colmer, Dorothy. “Character and Class in The Wife of Bath's Tale.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 72 (1973): 329–39.Google Scholar
Crane, Susan. Insular Romance: Politics, Faith, and Culture in Anglo-Norman and Middle English Literature. Berkeley: U of California P, 1986.Google Scholar
Delany, Sheila. “Sexual Economics: Chaucer's Wife of Bath and the Book of Margery Kempe.” Minnesota Review ns 5 (1975): 104–15.Google Scholar
Duby, Georges. Medieval Marriage: Two Models from Twelfth-Century France. Trans. Forster, Elborg. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Duby, Georges. The Three Orders: Feudal Society Imagined. Trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Gallacher, Patrick J. “Dame Alice and the Nobility of Pleasure.” Viator 13 (1982): 275–93.Google Scholar
de la Tour Landry, Geoffroy. The Book of the Knight of the Tower. Trans. Caxton, William. Ed. Offord, M. Y. EETS ss 2. London: Oxford UP, 1971.Google Scholar
de la Tour Landry, Geoffroy. Le livre du Chevalier de la Tour Landry. Ed. de Montaiglon, Anatole. Paris: Jannet, 1854.Google Scholar
Green, Richard Firth. “The Familia Regis and the Familia Cupidinis.” English Court Culture in the Later Middle Ages. Ed. Scattergood, V. J. and Sherbourne, J. W. New York: St. Martin's, 1983. 87–108.Google Scholar
Haller, Robert S. “The Wife of Bath and the Three Estates.” Annuale mediaevale 6 (1965): 47–64.Google Scholar
Howard, Donald. The Idea of the Canterbury Tales. Berkeley: U of California P, 1976.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1981.Google Scholar
de Meun, Jean and de Lorris, Guillaume. Le roman de la rose. Ed. Lecoy, Félix. 3 vols. CFMA 92, 95, 98. Paris: Champion, 1973–76.Google Scholar
de Meun, Jean and de Lorris, Guillaume. The Romance of the Rose. Trans. Robbins, Harry W. New York: Dutton, 1962.Google Scholar
Jordan, Robert M. “The Question of Genre: Five Chaucerian Romances.” Chaucer at Albany. Ed. Robbins, R. H. New York: Franklin, 1975. 77–103.Google Scholar
Kempe, Margery. The Book of Margery Kempe. Ed. Meech, Sanford Brown. EETS os 212. London: Oxford UP, 1940.Google Scholar
Koban, Charles. “Hearing Chaucer Out: The Art of Persuasion in the Wife of Bath's Tale.” Chaucer Review 5 (1970–71): 225–39.Google Scholar
Marshall, Leicester, H. Jr., “The Art of Impersonation: A General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales.” PMLA 95 (1980): 213–24.Google Scholar
Marshall, Leicester, H. Jr., “Of a Fire in the Dark: Public and Private Feminism in the Wife of Bath's Tale.” Women's Studies 11 (1984): 157–78.Google Scholar
The Letters of Abelard and Heloise. Trans. Radice, Betty. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974.Google Scholar
Malone, Kemp. “The Wife of Bath's Tale.” Modern Language Review 57 (1962): 481–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Jill. Chaucer and Medieval Estates Satire. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Margulies, Cecile Stoller. “The Marriages and the Wealth of the Wife of Bath.” Mediaeval Studies 24 (1962): 210–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monfrin, J. “Poème anglo-normand sur le marriage, les vices et les vertus, par Henri (XIIIe siècle).” Mélanges de langue et de littérature du moyen-âge et de la renaissance offerts à Jean Frappier. 2 vols. Geneva: Droz, 1970. 2: 845–66.Google Scholar
Murtaugh, Daniel M. “Women and Geoffrey Chaucer.” ELH 38 (1971): 473–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palomo, Dolores. “The Fate of the Wife of Bath's ‘Bad Husbands.‘” Chaucer Review 9 (1974–75): 303–19.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia A. Inescapable Romance: Studies in the Poetics of a Mode. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee. “‘For the Wyves love of Bathe’: Feminine Rhetoric and Poetic Resolution in the Roman de la rose and the Canterbury Tales.” Speculum 58 (1983): 656–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. W. Jr. “‘And for My Land Thus Hastow Mordred Me?‘: Land Tenure, the Cloth Industry, and the Wife of Bath.” Chaucer Review 14 (1979–80): 403–20.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W. Jr. A Preface to Chaucer: Studies in Medieval Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, Beryl. “Chaucer's Dame Alys: Critics in Blunderland?” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73 (1972): 381–95.Google Scholar
Ruggiers, Paul. The Art of the Canterbury Tales. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1965.Google Scholar
Sands, Donald B. “The Non-comic, Non-tragic Wife: Chaucer's Dame Alys as Sociopath.” Chaucer Review 12 (1977–78): 171–82.Google Scholar
Shahar, Shulamith. The Fourth Estate: A History of Women in the Middle Ages. Trans. Galai, Chaya. London: Methuen, 1983.Google Scholar
Specht, Henrik. Chaucer's Franklin in the Canterbury Tales. Copenhagen: Akademisk, 1981.Google Scholar
Vale, Malcolm. War and Chivalry: Warfare and Aristocratic Culture in England, France, and Burgundy at the End of the Middle Ages. London: Duckworth, 1981.Google Scholar
Vance, Eugene. “Le combat érotique chez Chrétien de Troyes.” Poétique 12 (1972): 544–71.Google Scholar
Winney, James, ed. The Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale. By Geoffrey Chaucer. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1965.Google Scholar