Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:18:52.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Platform or Publisher

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Theories and Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Berners-Lee, Tim. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web. HarperCollins Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
Bickert, Monika. Charting a Way Forward: Online Content Regulation. Facebook, Feb. 2020, about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Charting-A-Way-Forward_Online-Content-Regulation-White-Paper-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Bogost, Ian, and Montfort, Nick. Racing the Beam: The Atari Video Computer System. MIT Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Brandt, Deborah. The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy. Cambridge UP, 2014.Google Scholar
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. MIT Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Lori. Reading Writing Interfaces: From the Digital to the Bookbound. U of Minnesota P, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Tarleton. “The Politics of ‘Platforms.’New Media and Society, vol. 12, no. 3, 2010, pp. 347–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. Writing Machines. MIT Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschenbaum, Matthew. Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. MIT Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. Penguin Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. Penguin Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Sam. “Is Facebook a Publisher? In Public It Says No, but in Court It Says Yes.” The Guardian, 3 July 2018, www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/02/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-platform-publisher-lawsuit.Google Scholar
Liu, Alan. “Toward a Diversity Stack: Digital Humanities and Diversity as Technical Problem.” PMLA, vol. 135, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 131–51.Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice, and Lewis, Rebecca. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. Data and Society Research Institute, 2017.Google Scholar
McGurl, Mark. “Everything and Less: Fiction in the Age of Amazon.” Modern Language Quarterly, vol. 77, no. 3, 2016, pp. 447–71.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Murray, Simone. The Digital Literary Sphere: Reading, Writing, and Selling Books in the Internet Era. Johns Hopkins UP, 2018.Google Scholar
Neilsen, Rasmus Kleis, and Ganter, Sarah Anne. “Dealing with Digital Intermediaries: A Case Study of the Relations between Publishers and Platforms.” New Media and Society, vol. 20, no. 4, 2018, pp. 1600–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reilly, Tim. “What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” Communications and Strategies, no. 65, 2007, pp. 1337.Google Scholar
Perlow, Seth. “The Handwritten Styles of Instagram Poetry.” Post45, 17 Sept. 2019, post45.org/2019/09/the-handwritten-styles-of-instagram-poetry/.Google Scholar
Piper, Andrew. Enumerations: Data and Literary Study. U of Chicago P, 2018.Google Scholar
Rao, Mallika. “About That Period Photo That Broke the Internet.” Huffpost, 6 May 2015, www.huffpost.com/entry/rupi-kaur-instagram-period-photo-series_n_7213662.Google Scholar
Risam, Roopika. New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis, and Pedagogy. Northwestern UP, 2019.Google Scholar
Roberts, John. The Intangibilities of Form: Skill and Deskilling in Art after the Readymade. Verso, 2007.Google Scholar
“Rupi Kaur Reinvents Poetry for the Social-Media Generation.” The Economist, 1 Nov. 2017, www.economist.com/prospero/2017/11/01/rupi-kaur-reinvents-poetry-for-the-social-media-generation.Google Scholar
Shirky, Clay. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. Penguin Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Silverman, Craig, and Mac, Ryan. “Facebook Knows That Adding Labels to Trump's False Claims Does Little to Stop Their Spread.” BuzzFeed News, 16 Nov. 2020, www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/facebook-labels-trump-lies-do-not-stop-spread.Google Scholar
Underwood, Ted. Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change. U of Chicago P, 2019.Google Scholar
United States, Congress, House. United States Code. Title 47, section 230, Office of the Law Revision Counsel, 14 Apr. 2021, uscode.house.gov.Google Scholar
Vadde, Aarthi. “Amateur Creativity: Contemporary Literature and the Digital Publishing Scene.” New Literary History, vol. 48, no. 1, 2017, pp. 2751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadde, Aarthi. “Criticism for the Whole Person.” With Saikat Majumdar. The Critic as Amateur, edited by Majumdar and Vadde, Bloomsbury, 2019, pp. 128.Google Scholar
Vadde, Aarthi, and Pressman, Jessica. “Web 2.0 and Literary Criticism.” Post45, 17 Sept. 2019, post45.org/2019/09/web-2-0-and-literary-criticism/.Google Scholar
Vee, Annette. Coding Literacy: How Computer Programming Is Changing Writing. MIT Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar