Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:14:49.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning to Read in the Digital Age: From Reading Texts to Hacking Codes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Yves Citton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Reading is still often perceived as the decoding of a message, as if the text were meant to be merely received, as if it had been composed in a known and invariable code, and as if the meaning were determined solely by the author. Since at least the 1960s, however, theories of interpretation have constructed (literary) reading in a more elaborate and inventive fashion: while each author was supposed to invent a singular language against the background of the common language, each interpreter had to create something new, even interpreters reading the same text, because each interpreter understood the text and its singular language within an ever-changing context of actualization. The model of interpretation nevertheless remained indebted to the activity of deciphering: the ever-changing meaning was to be found in the text itself.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 130 , Issue 3 , May 2015 , pp. 743 - 749
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barthes, Roland. Criticism and Truth. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Berry, David M. The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age. London: Palgrave, 2011. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, David M. Understanding Digital Humanities. London: Palgrave, 2012. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citton, Yves. L'avenir des humanités. Économie de la connaissance ou cultures de l'interprétation? Paris: Découverte, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Citton, Yves. “From Theory to Bricolage: Indiscipline and the Exemplary Gesture of Interpretation.” International Social Science Journal 62.207-08 (2014): 53–66. Print.Google Scholar
Citton, Yves. Lire, interpréter, actualiser. Pourquoi les études littéraires? Paris: Amsterdam, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Citton, Yves. “Reading Literature and the Political Ecology of Gestures in the Age of Semiocapitalism.” New Literary History 44.2 (2013): 285–308. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. Common Core State Standards Initiative. Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2 June 2012. Web. 21 Aug. 2014.Google Scholar
Davidson, Cathy N. Now You See It: How Technology and Brain Science Will Transform Schools and Business for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Penguin, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. Uses of Literature. Hoboken: Wiley, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Margaret W. “The MLA and the Common Core State Standards Initiative: Continuing the Conversation.” MLA Commons. MLA, Apr. 2014. Web. 21 Aug. 2014.Google Scholar
Flusser, Vilém. Into the Universe of Technical Images. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2012. Print.Google Scholar
Fuller, Matthew. Software Studies: A Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT P, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, Alexander. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge: MIT P, 2004. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, Alexander, and Thacker, Eugene. The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2012. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himanen, Pekka. Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age. Edinburgh: Floris, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Huyghe, Pierre-Damien. À quoi tient le design. Grenoble: De l'Incidence, 2015. Print.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. “From the Transmission of Representation to the Education of Attention.” 1997. The Debated Mind: Evolutionary Psychology versus Ethnography. Ed. Whitehouse, Harvey. New York: Berg, 2001. 113–53. Mind, Culture, and Activity Homepage. Web. 24 Oct. 2013.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: Penguin, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Savage Mind. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1966. Print.Google Scholar
Luttes de classes sur le web. Spec. issue of Multitudes 54 (2013): n. pag. Web. 30 Mar. 2015.Google Scholar
Manovich, Lev. The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT P, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Manovich, Lev. Software Takes Command. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzarella, Arturo. La grande rete della scrittura. La letteratura dopo la rivoluzione digitale. Torino: Boringhier, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Distant Reading. London: Verso, 2013. Print. Pasquinelli, Matteo. Animal Spirit: A Bestiary of the Commons. Rotterdam: NAI, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Scholz, Trebor, ed. Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge, 2013. Print.Google Scholar
Steiner, David. “Our Dogmatic Slumbers.” Profession (2007): 141–49. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terranova, Tiziana. Network Cultures: Politics for the Information Age. New York: Pluto, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Wark, McKenzie. A Hacker Manifesto. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2004. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar